ArticlemHealth2016
A recommended guideline for the development of mHealth Apps.
Article in mHealth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Smoking Cessation Apps: A Systematic Review of Format, Outcomes, and Features.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Challenges With Developing Secure Mobile Health Applications: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Pooled it
- Potential Use of Mobile Phone Applications for Self-Monitoring and Increasing Daily Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: A Systematized Review.Nutrients · 2019Pooled it
- Feasibility and Usability of Kegel Exercise Pregnancy Training App (KEPT App) among Pregnant Women with Urinary Incontinence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- What's in an App? Scoping Review and Quality Assessment of Clinically Available Hearing-Aid-Connected Apps.Audiology research · 2025Review
- Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) management using a nutrition recommender mobile application: identifying key requirements.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Participant Contributions to Person-Generated Health Data Research Using Mobile Devices: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Workflow optimization in acute stroke therapy using a mobile application - a pilot study.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- The influence of fitness mobile apps on workout behavior intention among Chinese young adults.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Feasibility of a Multimodal Telemedical Intervention for Patients with Parkinson's Disease-A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- A large scale analysis of mHealth app user reviews.Empirical software engineering · 2022Article
- 'Personal Health Surveillance': The Use of mHealth in Healthcare Responsibilisation.Public health ethics · 2021Article
- A Biofeedback App for Migraine: Development and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Digital Technology and Mobile Health in Behavioral Migraine Therapy: a Narrative Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2018Review
- Adolescents' Perspectives on a Mobile App for Relationships: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2018Article
- Treatment of Low Back Pain with a Digital Multidisciplinary Pain Treatment App: Short-Term Results.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2017Article
- The fitness of apps: a theory-based examination of mobile fitness app usage over 5 months.mHealth · 2017Article
- Safe, sound and desirable: development of mHealth apps under the stress of rapid life cycles.mHealth · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMobile Health or mHealth applications cope with medical or health issues supported by smartphones. Being a part of great importance in healthcare, mHealth apps are able to improve both the quality of medical services and the safety of the patients. It is regarded to be a new field with great prospect that attracts the interest of the stakeholders and the developers, above all. Of all the entities involved, developers have to face many challenges classified in four pillars: the regulation framework, the market, the technical issues and society. This paper aims to describe the role of the developers in the mHealth apps' market, the barriers they deal with and also, the impact of their work in the mobile healthcare domain. In our viewpoint, we propose a guideline with all of the developers' requirements for the buildup of mHealth apps.
methodsThe methodology followed includes a Boolean search strategy used in academic libraries (PubMed, IEEE Xplore, JMIR, The Cochrane Library) and search engines additionally (Google and Google Scholar), aiming to identify the developers' perspective.
resultsOur research from October until December of 2014 led us to academic papers referring to the various demands that developers have to confront. The major outcome of our research is the general acknowledgement of the dominant role that developers own in the mHealth apps' process.
conclusionsMobile technology allies multiple groups such as users, patients, providers of medical services, software developers, governments and even, non-governmental organizations. In particular, the developers' perspective involves the legal boundaries, the side of the market, the technological requirements (programming, devices, designing) and the moral aspects, as well. Developers should define the purposes of their apps-either diagnostic or therapeutic-and gain the confidence of the users in order to dominate the market, yet comply with the regulations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.