ArticleBrain and behavior2017
A method for independent component graph analysis of resting-state fMRI.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- DMN function changes on resting state fMRI in perimenopausal women.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Phenotyping Superagers Using Resting-State fMRI.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Spindle-slow oscillation coupling correlates with memory performance and connectivity changes in a hippocampal network after sleep.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Altered Granger Causal Connectivity of Resting-State Neural Networks in Patients With Leukoaraiosis-Associated Cognitive Impairment-A Cross-Sectional Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Reconfiguration of large-scale functional connectivity in patients with disorders of consciousness.Brain and behavior · 2020Article
- The Locus Coeruleus- Norepinephrine System in Stress and Arousal: Unraveling Historical, Current, and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Review
- Tinnitus distress: a paradoxical attention to the sound?Journal of neurology · 2019Article
- Revealing hemodynamic heterogeneity of gliomas based on signal profile features of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2019Article
- General Anesthesia: A Probe to Explore Consciousness.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2019Article
- Role of Dimensionality in Predicting the Spontaneous Behavior of the Brain Using the Classical Ising Model and the Ising Model Implemented on a Structural Connectome.Brain connectivity · 2018Article
- Multimodal Neuroimaging Approach to Variability of Functional Connectivity in Disorders of Consciousness: A PET/MRI Pilot Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- A New Analysis of Resting State Connectivity and Graph Theory Reveals Distinctive Short-Term Modulations due to Whisker Stimulation in Rats.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Comparing brain graphs in which nodes are regions of interest or independent components: A simulation study.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2017Article
- A method for independent component graph analysis of resting-state fMRI.Brain and behavior · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIndependent component analysis (ICA) has been extensively used for reducing task-free BOLD fMRI recordings into spatial maps and their associated time-courses. The spatially identified independent components can be considered as intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) of non-contiguous regions. To date, the spatial patterns of the networks have been analyzed with techniques developed for volumetric data.
objectiveHere, we detail a graph building technique that allows these ICNs to be analyzed with graph theory.
methodsFirst, ICA was performed at the single-subject level in 15 healthy volunteers using a 3T MRI scanner. The identification of nine networks was performed by a multiple-template matching procedure and a subsequent component classification based on the network "neuronal" properties. Second, for each of the identified networks, the nodes were defined as 1,015 anatomically parcellated regions. Third, between-node functional connectivity was established by building edge weights for each networks. Group-level graph analysis was finally performed for each network and compared to the classical network.
resultsNetwork graph comparison between the classically constructed network and the nine networks showed significant differences in the auditory and visual medial networks with regard to the average degree and the number of edges, while the visual lateral network showed a significant difference in the small-worldness.
conclusionsThis novel approach permits us to take advantage of the well-recognized power of ICA in BOLD signal decomposition and, at the same time, to make use of well-established graph measures to evaluate connectivity differences. Moreover, by providing a graph for each separate network, it can offer the possibility to extract graph measures in a specific way for each network. This increased specificity could be relevant for studying pathological brain activity or altered states of consciousness as induced by anesthesia or sleep, where specific networks are known to be altered in different strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.