Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28293468›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2017

A method for independent component graph analysis of resting-state fMRI.

Demetrius Ribeiro de Paula, Erik Ziegler, Pubuditha M Abeyasinghe, Tushar K Das, Carlo Cavaliere, Marco Aiello, Lizette Heine, Carol di Perri, Athena Demertzi, Quentin Noirhomme and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phenotyping Superagers Using Resting-State fMRI.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. General Anesthesia: A Probe to Explore Consciousness.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Demetrius Ribeiro de PaulaDepartment of Physics & Astronomy Brain & Mind Institute Western University London ON Canada.
Erik ZieglerComa Science Group GIGA Research Université et Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Liège Belgium.
Pubuditha M AbeyasingheDepartment of Physics & Astronomy Brain & Mind Institute Western University London ON Canada.
Tushar K DasDepartment of Physics & Astronomy Brain & Mind Institute Western University London ON Canada.
Carlo CavaliereComa Science Group GIGA Research Université et Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Liège Belgium; IRCCS SDN, Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare Naples Italy.
Marco AielloIRCCS SDN, Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare Naples Italy.
Lizette HeineComa Science Group GIGA Research Université et Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Liège Belgium.
Carol di PerriComa Science Group GIGA Research Université et Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Liège Belgium.
Athena DemertziComa Science Group GIGA Research Université et Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Liège Belgium; Brain and Spine Institute (ICM) Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière Paris France.
Quentin NoirhommeComa Science Group GIGA Research Université et Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Liège Belgium.
Vanessa Charland-VervilleComa Science Group GIGA Research Université et Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Liège Belgium.
Audrey VanhaudenhuyseDepartment of Algology and Palliative Care Université de Liège Liege Belgium.
Johan StenderDepartment of Neuroscience and Pharmacology University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Francisco GomezDepartment of Mathematics Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Bogotá Bogotá Colombia.
Jean-Flory L TshibandaDepartment of Neurology Université de Liège Liège Belgium.
Steven LaureysComa Science Group GIGA Research Université et Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Liège Belgium; Department of Neurology Université de Liège Liège Belgium.
Adrian M OwenDepartment of Psychology Brain & Mind Institute Western University London ON Canada.
Andrea SodduDepartment of Physics & Astronomy Brain & Mind Institute Western University London ON Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIndependent component analysis (ICA) has been extensively used for reducing task-free BOLD fMRI recordings into spatial maps and their associated time-courses. The spatially identified independent components can be considered as intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) of non-contiguous regions. To date, the spatial patterns of the networks have been analyzed with techniques developed for volumetric data.

objectiveHere, we detail a graph building technique that allows these ICNs to be analyzed with graph theory.

methodsFirst, ICA was performed at the single-subject level in 15 healthy volunteers using a 3T MRI scanner. The identification of nine networks was performed by a multiple-template matching procedure and a subsequent component classification based on the network "neuronal" properties. Second, for each of the identified networks, the nodes were defined as 1,015 anatomically parcellated regions. Third, between-node functional connectivity was established by building edge weights for each networks. Group-level graph analysis was finally performed for each network and compared to the classical network.

resultsNetwork graph comparison between the classically constructed network and the nine networks showed significant differences in the auditory and visual medial networks with regard to the average degree and the number of edges, while the visual lateral network showed a significant difference in the small-worldness.

conclusionsThis novel approach permits us to take advantage of the well-recognized power of ICA in BOLD signal decomposition and, at the same time, to make use of well-established graph measures to evaluate connectivity differences. Moreover, by providing a graph for each separate network, it can offer the possibility to extract graph measures in a specific way for each network. This increased specificity could be relevant for studying pathological brain activity or altered states of consciousness as induced by anesthesia or sleep, where specific networks are known to be altered in different strength.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetPrincipal Component AnalysisBOLD fMRIgraph theoryindependent component analysisresting state

Identifiers

PMID28293468
PMCPMC5346515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.