Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28292917›Full record

ArticleGenetics2017

Paternal Genome Elimination in

Christina N Hodson, Phineas T Hamilton, Dave Dilworth, Chris J Nelson, Caitlin I Curtis, Steve J Perlman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Haplodiploidy accelerates mitogenome evolution in insects.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The genome sequence of a barkfly,Wellcome open research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Paternal genome elimination promotes altruism in viscous populations.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  16. Delete and survive: strategies of programmed genetic material elimination in eukaryotes.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  17. Evolution of sexual development and sexual dimorphism in insects.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina N HodsonDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, V8P 5C2, Canada hodson.christina@gmail.com stevep@uvic.ca.
Phineas T HamiltonDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, V8P 5C2, Canada.
Dave DilworthDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, V8P 5C2, Canada.
Chris J NelsonDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, V8P 5C2, Canada.
Caitlin I CurtisDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, V8P 5C2, Canada.
Steve J PerlmanDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, V8P 5C2, Canada hodson.christina@gmail.com stevep@uvic.ca.
University of Victoria · CACanadian Institute for Advanced Research · CAUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How sex is determined in insects is diverse and dynamic, and includes male heterogamety, female heterogamety, and haplodiploidy. In many insect lineages, sex determination is either completely unknown or poorly studied. We studied sex determination in Psocodea-a species-rich order of insects that includes parasitic lice, barklice, and booklice. We focus on a recently discovered species of

Indexed as

Sex Determination ProcessesAnimalsFemaleGenome, InsectGenomic ImprintingHeterochromatinHumansMalePhthirapteraHeterochromatingenome exclusiongenomic imprintingsegregation distortionsex determinationsex ratio

Identifiers

PMID28292917
PMCPMC5499165
OpenAlexW2599012117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.