Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28292885›Full record

Trial reportPhysiological reports2017

Heavy strength training improves running and cycling performance following prolonged submaximal work in well-trained female athletes.

Olav Vikmoen, Bent R Rønnestad, Stian Ellefsen, Truls Raastad

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physiological reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Effects of concurrent training sequence on VOFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Resistance Training for Cyclists: Scientific Evidence and Practical Recommendations.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Moving forward with backward pedaling: a review on eccentric cycling.European journal of applied physiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olav VikmoenSection for Sport Sciences, Lillehammer University College, Lillehammer, Norway olav.vikmoen@ffi.no.
Bent R RønnestadSection for Sport Sciences, Lillehammer University College, Lillehammer, Norway.
Stian EllefsenSection for Sport Sciences, Lillehammer University College, Lillehammer, Norway.
Truls RaastadDeparment of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Eastern Norway Research Institute · NONorwegian School of Sport Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of adding heavy strength training to female duathletes' normal endurance training on both cycling and running performance. Nineteen well-trained female duathletes (

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingAthletesBicyclingExercise TestFemaleHumansMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthOxygen ConsumptionPhysical EnduranceRunningTreatment OutcomeConcurrent trainingcycling economyprolonged cyclingprolonged runningrunning economy

Identifiers

PMID28292885
PMCPMC5350167
OpenAlexW2599717281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.