Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28292673›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2017

Bioresponsive transcutaneous patches.

Jicheng Yu, Yuqi Zhang, Anna R Kahkoska, Zhen Gu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Non-transdermal microneedles for advanced drug delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Digital health-high tech or high touch?Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Microneedle-mediated therapy for cardiovascular diseases.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent progress in drug delivery.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2019
    Review
  12. Advances in transdermal insulin delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2019
    Review
  13. Glucose-Responsive Microneedle Patches for Diabetes Treatment.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Advances in bioresponsive closed-loop drug delivery systems.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2018
    Review
  16. Bioresponsive Microneedles with a Sheath Structure for HSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Polymeric microneedles for transdermal protein delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jicheng YuJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery and Division of Pharmacoengineering Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Yuqi ZhangJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery and Division of Pharmacoengineering Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Anna R KahkoskaDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Zhen GuJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery and Division of Pharmacoengineering Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: zgu@email.unc.edu.

Funding

North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
Characterizing Impulsivity as a Determinant of Weight and Glycemic Control in Youth with Type 1 DiabetesF30DK113728 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAHKOSKA, ANNA RACHEL · 2017 to 2020
$171k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NIDDK NIH HHS F30 DK113728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transdermal drug delivery systems that utilize transcutaneous patches of arrayed microneedles have attracted increasing interest in medical practice as an alternative method to hypodermic injection. Over the past ten years, research has focused on leveraging physiological signals associated with diseases or skin-specific tissues to create bioresponsive patches that release drug directly in response to an internally-generated stimulus. This review surveys the recent advances in the development and use of bioresponsive transcutaneous patches for on-demand smart and precise drug delivery, exploiting different physiological signals including pH, serum glucose levels, and enzyme activity. The clinical potential of these devices, including challenges and opportunities, is also discussed.

Indexed as

Transdermal PatchAdministration, CutaneousAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsDrug MonitoringHumansNeedlesSkin

Identifiers

PMID28292673
PMCPMC6053065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.