Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28292257›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2017

Medical appropriateness of adult calls to Danish out-of-hours primary care: a questionnaire-based survey.

Karen Busk Nørøxe, Linda Huibers, Grete Moth, Peter Vedsted

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Do callers to out-of-hours care misuse an option to jump the phone queue?Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2019
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. General practice consultation patterns and patient factors predicting older patients' use of out-of-hours services: a nationwide register-based cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen Busk NørøxeDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. karen.bn@ph.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-2520-104X
Linda HuibersDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Grete MothDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Peter VedstedDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal utilisation of the out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) services remains a concern in public health policy. We need more knowledge on potentially avoidable contacts. This study examines the frequency of medically assessed inappropriate OOH-PC calls from adults, explores factors associated with such assessment, and examines the relation to patient-assessed severity of health problem and fulfilment of expectations.

methodsWe performed secondary analyses of data from a large cross-sectional survey on contacts to Danish OOH-PC. As access to Danish OOH-PC is provided through telephone triage delivered by a general practitioner (GP), we included only telephone contacts. A contact was characterised as medically inappropriate when the triage GP assessed that the request from a medical perspective should have been directed to daytime primary care. Appropriateness was examined in relation to patient characteristics, reason for encounter, time of contact, and whether the contact was triaged to a face-to-face consultation, and in relation to patient-assessed severity of the health problem and fulfilment of expectations. Associations were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) using multivariate analysis.

resultsOf all contacts, 23.7% were assessed as medically inappropriate. Such assessment was associated with: younger age, longer symptom duration, exacerbation of chronic condition, and contact only few hours away from own GP's office hours. Of medically inappropriate contacts, 31.3% were from patients aged 18-30 years, 41.5% concerned symptoms of > 24 h, 19.4% concerned exacerbation of chronic condition, and 21.3% were calls < 3 h away from own GP's regular office hours. Medicine request was the most frequent reason for an inappropriate contact (14.3% of medically inappropriate contacts). In 53.4% of contacts assessed as inappropriate, the health problem was considered as severe by patients and medical assessed inappropriateness was significantly associated with unfulfilled patient expectations.

conclusionsOne in four OOH-PC calls was considered medically inappropriate. Future efforts to reduce suboptimal use of OOH-PC should focus on the types of contacts with the highest optimisation potential, e.g., medication requests, long-lasting symptoms, and exacerbations. Such interventions should aim at bridging the gap between the GP's medical assessment and the patient's expectations to appropriate OOH-PC use.

Indexed as

General PractitionersTelephoneTriageAdolescentAdultAfter-Hours CareAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMedical OveruseMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioAfter-hours careDelivery of health careDenmarkHealth care seeking behaviorsHealth care utilisationPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID28292257
PMCPMC5351208
OpenAlexW2595492688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.