Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28291808›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Foraging and metabolic consequences of semi-anadromy for an endangered estuarine fish.

Bruce G Hammock, Steven B Slater, Randall D Baxter, Nann A Fangue, Dennis Cocherell, April Hennessy, Tomofumi Kurobe, Christopher Y Tai, Swee J Teh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bruce G HammockAquatic Health Program, School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology, VetMed 3B, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-4736
Steven B SlaterCalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlife, Stockton, California, United States of America.
Randall D BaxterCalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlife, Stockton, California, United States of America.
Nann A FangueDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Dennis CocherellDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
April HennessyCalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlife, Stockton, California, United States of America.
Tomofumi KurobeAquatic Health Program, School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology, VetMed 3B, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Christopher Y TaiAquatic Health Program, School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology, VetMed 3B, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Swee J TehAquatic Health Program, School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology, VetMed 3B, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
University of California, Davis · USCalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlife · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diadromy affords fish access to productive ecosystems, increasing growth and ultimately fitness, but it is unclear whether these advantages persist for species migrating within highly altered habitat. Here, we compared the foraging success of wild Delta Smelt-an endangered, zooplanktivorous, annual, semi-anadromous fish that is endemic to the highly altered San Francisco Estuary (SFE)-collected from freshwater (<0.55 psu) and brackish habitat (≥0.55 psu). Stomach fullness, averaged across three generations of wild Delta Smelt sampled from juvenile through adult life stages (n = 1,318), was 1.5-fold higher in brackish than in freshwater habitat. However, salinity and season interacted, with higher fullness (1.7-fold) in freshwater than in brackish habitat in summer, but far higher fullness in brackish than freshwater habitat during fall/winter and winter/spring (1.8 and 2.0-fold, respectively). To examine potential causes of this interaction we compared mesozooplankton abundance, collected concurrently with the Delta Smelt, in freshwater and brackish habitat during summer and fall/winter, and the metabolic rate of sub-adult Delta Smelt acclimated to salinities of 0.4, 2.0, and 12.0 psu in a laboratory experiment. A seasonal peak in mesozooplankton density coincided with the summer peak in Delta Smelt foraging success in freshwater, and a pronounced decline in freshwater mesozooplankton abundance in the fall coincided with declining stomach fullness, which persisted for the remainder of the year (fall, winter and spring). In brackish habitat, greater foraging 'efficiency' (prey items in stomachs/mesozooplankton abundance) led to more prey items per fish and generally higher stomach fullness (i.e., a higher proportion of mesozooplankton detected in concurrent trawls were eaten by fish in brackish habitat). Delta Smelt exhibited no difference in metabolic rate across the three salinities, indicating that metabolic responses to salinity are unlikely to have caused the stomach fullness results. Adult migration and freshwater spawning therefore places young fish in a position to exploit higher densities of prey in freshwater in the late spring/summer, and subsequent movement downstream provides older fish more accessible prey in brackish habitat. Thus, despite endemism to a highly-altered estuary, semi-anadromy provided substantial foraging benefits to Delta Smelt, consistent with other temperate migratory fish.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesEstuariesFeeding BehaviorAnimalsOsmeriformesSalinitySeasons

Identifiers

PMID28291808
PMCPMC5349674
OpenAlexW2606042670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.