Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28291798›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Implantable porous gelatin microspheres sustained release of bFGF and improved its neuroprotective effect on rats after spinal cord injury.

Li Lan, Fu-Rong Tian, De-Li ZhuGe, Qi-Chuan ZhuGe, Bi-Xin Shen, Bing-Hui Jin, Jian-Ping Huang, Ming-Ze Wu, Lu-Xin Fan, Ying-Zheng Zhao and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Biomaterial-Based bFGF Delivery for Nerve Repair.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Polymeric Fibers as Scaffolds for Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Li LanZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Aging and Neurological Disorder Research, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Fu-Rong TianSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
De-Li ZhuGeSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Qi-Chuan ZhuGeZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Aging and Neurological Disorder Research, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Bi-Xin ShenSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Bing-Hui JinSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Jian-Ping HuangWenZhou Chinese Medicine Hospital, WenZhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Ming-Ze WuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Lu-Xin FanSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Ying-Zheng ZhaoSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
He-Lin XuZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Aging and Neurological Disorder Research, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Wenzhou Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · CNWenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, porous gelatin microspheres (GMSs) were constructed to improve the neuroprotective effect of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) on spinal cord injury. GMSs were prepared by a W/O emulsion template, followed by cross-linking, washing and drying. The particle sizes and surface porosity of the blank GMSs were carefully characterized by scan electronic microscopy. The blank GMSs have a mean particle size of 35μm and theirs surface was coarse and porous. bFGF was easily encapsulated inside the bulk GMSs through diffusion along the porous channel. 200μg of bFGF was completely encapsulated in 100mg of GMSs. The bFGF-loaded GMSs displayed a continuous drug release pattern without an obvious burst release over two weeks in vitro. Moreover, the therapeutic effects of bFGF-loaded GMSs were also evaluated in spinal cord injury rat model. After implantation of bFGF-loaded GMSs, the recovery of the motor function of SCI rats were evaluated by behavioral score and foot print experiment. The motor function of SCI rats treated with bFGF-loaded GMSs was more obvious than that treated with free bFGF solution (P<0.05). At the 28th days after treatment, rats were sacrificed and the injured spinal were removed for histopathological and apoptosis examination. Compared with treatment with free bFGF solution, treatment with bFGF-loaded GMSs resulted in a less necrosis, less infiltration of leukocytes, and a reduced the cavity ratio and less apoptotic cells in injured spinal(P<0.01), indicating its better therapeutic effect. Implantable porous GMSs may be a potential carrier to deliver bFGF for therapy of spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

MicrospheresAnimalsFibroblast Growth Factor 2GelatinImmunohistochemistryNeuroprotective AgentsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpinal Cord InjuriesFibroblast Growth Factor 2GelatinNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID28291798
PMCPMC5349659
OpenAlexW2636424831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.