Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28291762›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2017

The XChemExplorer graphical workflow tool for routine or large-scale protein-ligand structure determination.

Tobias Krojer, Romain Talon, Nicholas Pearce, Patrick Collins, Alice Douangamath, Jose Brandao-Neto, Alexandre Dias, Brian Marsden, Frank von Delft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Structural Biology for Target Identification and Validation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tobias KrojerStructural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, England.
Romain TalonStructural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, England.
Nicholas PearceStructural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, England.
Patrick CollinsDiamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0QX, England.
Alice DouangamathDiamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0QX, England.
Jose Brandao-NetoDiamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0QX, England.
Alexandre DiasDiamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0QX, England.
Brian MarsdenStructural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, England.
Frank von DelftStructural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, England.

Funding

CIHRWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 092809/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

XChemExplorer (XCE) is a data-management and workflow tool to support large-scale simultaneous analysis of protein-ligand complexes during structure-based ligand discovery (SBLD). The user interfaces of established crystallographic software packages such as CCP4 [Winn et al. (2011), Acta Cryst. D67, 235-242] or PHENIX [Adams et al. (2010), Acta Cryst. D66, 213-221] have entrenched the paradigm that a `project' is concerned with solving one structure. This does not hold for SBLD, where many almost identical structures need to be solved and analysed quickly in one batch of work. Functionality to track progress and annotate structures is essential. XCE provides an intuitive graphical user interface which guides the user from data processing, initial map calculation, ligand identification and refinement up until data dissemination. It provides multiple entry points depending on the need of each project, enables batch processing of multiple data sets and records metadata, progress and annotations in an SQLite database. XCE is freely available and works on any Linux and Mac OS X system, and the only dependency is to have the latest version of CCP4 installed. The design and usage of this tool are described here, and its usefulness is demonstrated in the context of fragment-screening campaigns at the Diamond Light Source. It is routinely used to analyse projects comprising 1000 data sets or more, and therefore scales well to even very large ligand-design projects.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsSoftwareAlgorithmsCrystallography, X-RayLigandsProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsUser-Computer InterfaceWorkflowLigandsProteinsfragment screeningPanDDAprotein–ligand structurestructure-based ligand designXChemExplorer

Identifiers

PMID28291762
PMCPMC5349439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.