Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28291755›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2017

Tools for ligand validation in Coot.

Paul Emsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Avoiding pitfalls when modelling ligands in macromolecular crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Revisiting the structure of UBR box from human UBR6.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Structure-based insights into the mechanism of [4Fe-4S]-dependent sulfur insertase LarE.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paul EmsleyMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QH, England.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A025_1012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coot is a molecular-graphics program primarily aimed at model building using X-ray data. Recently, tools for the manipulation and representation of ligands have been introduced. Here, these new tools for ligand validation and comparison are described. Ligands in the wwPDB have been scored by density-fit, distortion and atom-clash metrics. The distributions of these scores can be used to assess the relative merits of the particular ligand in the protein-ligand complex of interest by means of `sliders' akin to those now available for each accession code on the wwPDB websites.

Indexed as

SoftwareBinding SitesComputer GraphicsCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsSmall Molecule LibrariesLigandsProteinsSmall Molecule LibrariesCootligand manipulationligand representationligand validationmodel building

Identifiers

PMID28291755
PMCPMC5349432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.