ArticleMilitary medicine2017
Variation in Postinjury Antibiotic Prophylaxis Patterns Over Five Years in a Combat Zone.
Article in Military medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of Fracture-Related Infection in Conflict Zones: Lessons Learned from Medical Missions to Gaza.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Review of Omadacycline for Potential Utility in the Military Health System for the Treatment of Wound Infections.Military medicine · 2024Review
- Influencing mechanism of the use behavior of clinical practice guidelines on antimicrobials: evidence from the integration of theory of reasoned action and organizational readiness for change.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- IDCRP Trauma-Related Infection Research.Military medicine · 2022Article
- IDCRP Combat-Related Extremity Wound Infection Research.Military medicine · 2022Review
- Department of Defense Trauma Registry Infectious Disease Module Impact on Clinical Practice.Military medicine · 2022Review
- Application of berberine-loaded albumin nanoparticles in infections of traumatic wounds.International journal of burns and trauma · 2022Article
- Antibiotic Practice Patterns for Extremity Wound Infections among Blast-Injured Subjects.Military medicine · 2020Article
- After the Battlefield: Infectious Complications among Wounded Warriors in the Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study.Military medicine · 2019Article
- Antimicrobial Prophylaxis with Combat-Related Open Soft-Tissue Injuries.Military medicine · 2018Article
- Early infectious outcomes after addition of fluoroquinolone or aminoglycoside to posttrauma antibiotic prophylaxis in combat-related open fracture injuries.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 2008, a clinical practice guideline (CPG) was developed for the prevention of infections among combat casualties and was later revised in 2011. We evaluated utilization of antimicrobials within 48 hours following injury in the combat zone over a 5-year period (June 2009 through May 2014) with regard to number of regimens, type of antimicrobial, and adherence to the 2011 CPG. The study population consisted of 5,196 wounded military personnel. Open fractures and skin and soft-tissue injuries were the most frequent injuries. Closed injuries had the highest overall compliance (83%), whereas open fractures and maxillofacial injuries had significant improvement in compliance from 2009-2010 (34 and 50%, respectively) to 2013-2014 (73 and 76%, respectively; p < 0.05). Part of the improvement with open fractures was a significant reduction of expanded Gram-negative coverage (61% received it in 2009-2010 compared to 7% in 2013-2014; p < 0.001). Use of Gram-negative coverage with maxillofacial injuries also significantly declined (37-12%; p = 0.001). Being injured during 2011-2014 compared to 2009-2010 was associated with CPG compliance (p < 0.001), while high injury severity scores (≥10) and admission to the intensive care unit in Germany were associated with noncompliance (p < 0.001). Our analysis demonstrates an increasing trend toward CPG compliance with significant reduction of expanded Gram-negative coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.