Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28291334›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2017

Rapid Real-Time Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing with Electrical Sensing on Plastic Microchips with Printed Electrodes.

Mohammadali Safavieh, Hardik J Pandya, Maanasa Venkataraman, Prudhvi Thirumalaraju, Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy, Anupriya Singh, Devbalaji Prabhakar, Manjyot Kaur Chug, Hadi Shafiee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impedance-Based Biosensing ofMicromachines · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammadali SafaviehDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital-Harvard Medical School , 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8929-1902
Hardik J PandyaDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital-Harvard Medical School , 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Maanasa VenkataramanDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital-Harvard Medical School , 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Prudhvi ThirumalarajuDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital-Harvard Medical School , 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Manoj Kumar KanakasabapathyDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital-Harvard Medical School , 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Anupriya SinghDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital-Harvard Medical School , 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Devbalaji PrabhakarDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital-Harvard Medical School , 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Manjyot Kaur ChugDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital-Harvard Medical School , 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Hadi ShafieeDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital-Harvard Medical School , 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2240-7648
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Sensitive and quantitative point-of-care viral load testing on paperR01AI118502 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHAFIEE, HADI · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing is important for efficient and timely therapeutic decision making. Due to globally spread bacterial resistance, the efficacy of antibiotics is increasingly being impeded. Conventional antibiotic tests rely on bacterial culture, which is time-consuming and can lead to potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescription and up-front broad range of antibiotic use. There is an urgent need to develop point-of-care platform technologies to rapidly detect pathogens, identify the right antibiotics, and monitor mutations to help adjust therapy. Here, we report a biosensor for rapid (<90 min), real time, and label-free bacteria isolation from whole blood and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Target bacteria are captured on flexible plastic-based microchips with printed electrodes using antibodies (30 min), and its electrical response is monitored in the presence and absence of antibiotics over an hour of incubation time. We evaluated the microchip with Escherichia coli and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as clinical models with ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, daptomycin, gentamicin, and methicillin antibiotics. The results are compared with the current standard methods, i.e. bacteria viability and conventional antibiogram assays. The technology presented here has the potential to provide precise and rapid bacteria screening and guidance in clinical therapies by identifying the correct antibiotics for pathogens.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistant pathogenantibiotic susceptibility testelectrical sensingflexible electronicsscreen-printed electrodes

Identifiers

PMID28291334
PMCPMC5695042
OpenAlexW2601456096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.