Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28291243›Full record

ArticleScientific data2017

A standard database for drug repositioning.

Adam S Brown, Chirag J Patel

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Cancers · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CPDP: Contrastive Protein-Drug Pre-Training for Novel Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. From Lab to Clinic: Success Stories of Repurposed Drugs in Treating Major Diseases.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam S BrownDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck St, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4393-1003
Chirag J PatelDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck St, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8756-8525

Funding

Training Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative GenomicsT32HG002295 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Peter J Park · 2001 to 2026
$15.8M
Data-driven identification of environmental factors in cardiovascular diseaseR00ES023504 · NIEHS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PATEL, CHIRAG J. · 2016 to 2018
$728k
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002295NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES023504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug repositioning, the process of discovering, validating, and marketing previously approved drugs for new indications, is of growing interest to academia and industry due to reduced time and costs associated with repositioned drugs. Computational methods for repositioning are appealing because they putatively nominate the most promising candidate drugs for a given indication. Comparing the wide array of computational repositioning methods, however, is a challenge due to inconsistencies in method validation in the field. Furthermore, a common simplifying assumption, that all novel predictions are false, is intellectually unsatisfying and hinders reproducibility. We address this assumption by providing a gold standard database, repoDB, that consists of both true positives (approved drugs), and true negatives (failed drugs). We have made the full database and all code used to prepare it publicly available, and have developed a web application that allows users to browse subsets of the data (http://apps.chiragjpgroup.org/repoDB/).

Indexed as

Databases, FactualDrug RepositioningAlgorithms

Identifiers

PMID28291243
PMCPMC5349249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.