ReviewMolecular bioSystems2017
The Ca
Review in Molecular bioSystems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- CaBiomolecules · 2025Review
- The contribution of the Golgi and the endoplasmic reticulum to calcium and pH homeostasis in Toxoplasma gondii.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review on physiological and biological activities of carnosine: turning from preclinical facts to potential clinical applications.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- The mechanism and prevention of mitochondrial injury after exercise.Journal of physiology and biochemistry · 2021Review
- Multiscale Simulation Reveals Passive Proton Transport Through SERCA on the Microsecond Timescale.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- A Computational Swiss Army Knife Approach to Unraveling the Secrets of Proton Movement through SERCA.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- The Endoplasmic Reticulum and Calcium Homeostasis in Pancreatic Beta Cells.Endocrinology · 2020Review
- Emerging Diversity in Lipid-Protein Interactions.Chemical reviews · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.