Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28290100›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2018

Triage of patients for attenuation-corrected stress-first Tc-99m SPECT MPI using a simplified clinical pre-test scoring model.

Shreyas Gowdar, Waseem Chaudhry, Alan W Ahlberg, Milena J Henzlova, W Lane Duvall

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality metrics for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: an ASNC information statement.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Review
  4. Choosing patients for stress-first/stress-only imaging: Keep it simple.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shreyas GowdarDivision of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.
Waseem ChaudhryDivision of Cardiology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA.
Alan W AhlbergDivision of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.
Milena J HenzlovaMount Sinai Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Heart, New York, NY, USA.
W Lane DuvallDivision of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA. lane.duvall@hhchealth.org.
Hartford Hospital · USMaine Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStress-only Tc-99m SPECT MPI saves time and reduces radiation exposure while a normal study has a benign prognosis. However, no guidelines exist as to which patients should undergo stress-first MPI. The purpose of this study was to validate a previously published pre-test prediction scoring model and refine the stress-first triage process further if possible.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent an attenuation-corrected Tc-99m SPECT MPI over a 39-month period. Based on 17-segment model semi-quantitative scoring, a successful stress-first MPI was defined as a summed stress attenuation-corrected score ≤ 1. Based on results from multivariate analysis, the previously published prediction score (comprised eight clinical and demographic variables) was compared to triage based on coronary artery disease (CAD) status alone and with the addition of other highly associated variables. Logistic regression and Chi-squared analyses were used to determine the magnitude of variable effect and to compare model results.

resultsA total of 2,277 patients were included, and the prediction score successfully stratified patients into low-risk (91.1% successful stress-first), intermediate-risk (79.4%), and high-risk (50.7%) groups. Comparing the use of the prediction score to the use of a history of CAD as the only triage factor, 69.0% of patients would be accurately triaged using the prediction score with a cutoff of 7 (maximized sensitivity and specificity), while 78.6% were correctly triaged with CAD status alone (P < .0001). The addition of variables highly associated with a successful stress-first protocol (congestive heart failure [OR 3.4] and an abnormal resting ECG [OR 2.1]) to CAD status further enhanced triage accuracy to 81% (P < .0001).

conclusionsWhile the previously described prediction score effectively identifies patients who can successfully undergo stress-first MPI, it is cumbersome. Triaging based solely on CAD status and with the addition of other key variables is practical and provides improved predictive accuracy for successful stress-first MPI. Utilizing this simplified pre-test scoring model may allow for wider adoption of stress-first imaging protocols which have clear advantages over traditional rest-stress protocols.

Indexed as

TechnetiumTriageAdultAgedChi-Square DistributionCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingRetrospective StudiesTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTechnetiumcoronary artery diseaseMyocardial perfusion imagingSPECTstress-first protocol

Identifiers

PMID28290100
OpenAlexW2596707319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.