Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28290099›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2018

Fully automated analysis of attenuation-corrected SPECT for the long-term prediction of acute myocardial infarction.

Manish Motwani, William D Leslie, Andrew L Goertzen, Yuka Otaki, Guido Germano, Daniel S Berman, Piotr J Slomka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CT attenuation correction improves quantitative risk prediction by cardiac SPECT in obese patients.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  5. Prediction of 2-year major adverse cardiac events from myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and clinical risk factors.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Automated quantitative analysis of CZT SPECT stratifies cardiovascular risk in the obese population: Analysis of the REFINE SPECT registry.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Automation in Nuclear Cardiology: Time for Flurpiridaz to Join the Club.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  8. CRAX: A simple cardiovascular risk assessment tool to predict risk of acute myocardial infarction or death.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  11. Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Review
  12. Leveraging latest computer science tools to advance nuclear cardiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Fully automated analysis of perfusion data: The rise of the machines.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  15. New Trends in Quantitative Nuclear Cardiology Methods.Current cardiovascular imaging reports · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Manish MotwaniCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
William D LeslieUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Andrew L GoertzenUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Yuka OtakiCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Guido GermanoCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Daniel S BermanCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Piotr J SlomkaCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. slomkap@cshs.org.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

Quantitative Prediction of Disease and Outcomes from Next Generation SPECT and CTR01HL089765 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI SLOMKA, PIOTR J · 2007 to 2021
$6.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost prior studies assessing the prognostic value of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) have used semi-quantitative visual analysis. We assessed the feasibility of large-scale fully automated quantitative analysis of SPECT MPI to predict acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Additionally, we examined the impact of attenuation correction (AC) in automated strategies. METHODS AND

results5960 patients underwent rest/stress SPECT MPI with AC. Left ventricular (LV) segmentation, contour QC check, and quantitation of stress and ischemic total perfusion deficit (sTPD, iTPD) were performed. Only contours flagged for potential errors by QC were visually checked (10%). During long-term follow-up (6.1 ± 2.7 years), 522 patients (9%) had AMI. In Cox models, adjusted for ejection fraction (LVEF) and other relevant covariates, there was a stepwise increase in risk hazard ratios by quartile for sTPD (Q1: 1.00, Q2: 1.26, Q3: 1.66, Q4: 1.79; P < 0.0001) and iTPD (Q1: 1.00, Q2: 1.26, Q3: 1.66, Q4: 1.79; P < 0.0001). Area under curve for AMI prediction by automated measures was similar for AC and non-AC data (sTPD: 0.63 vs 0.64, P = 0.85; iTPD: 0.61 vs 0.61, P = 0.70). Higher AUCs for both AC and non-AC data were seen for AMI occurring in the first 1 year of follow-up (sTPD: 0.71, 0.72; iTPD: 0.70, 0.68).

conclusionsFully automated sTPD was an independent predictor of future AMI events even after adjusting for LVEF and other relevant covariates. AC did not significantly impact predictive accuracy.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial Perfusion ImagingProportional Hazards ModelsQuality ControlTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photonmyocardial infarctionMyocardial perfusion imagingprognosisquantificationtotal perfusion deficit

Identifiers

PMID28290099
PMCPMC5597460
OpenAlexW2596358393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.