Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28290092›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2018

Evaluation of Mammogram Parties as an Effective Community Navigation Method.

Kristi L Allgood, Bijou Hunt, Jacqueline M Kanoon, Melissa A Simon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Leveraging an Implementation Science Framework to Adapt and Scale a Patient Navigator Intervention to Improve Mammography Screening Outreach in a New Community.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristi L AllgoodSinai Health System, Sinai Urban Health Institute, 1500 S. Fairfield Avenue, K435, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA. kallgood@umich.edu.
Bijou HuntSinai Health System, Sinai Urban Health Institute, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jacqueline M KanoonSinai Health System, Sinai Urban Health Institute, 1500 S. Fairfield Avenue, K435, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA.
Melissa A SimonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Research Education CoreU54CA202997 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CIECIERSKI, CHRISTINA, FEINGLASS, JOSEPH M · 2015 to 2024
$13.8M
Research Education CoreU54CA203000 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CIECIERSKI, CHRISTINA, FEINGLASS, JOSEPH M · 2015 to 2024
$12.4M
The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC)U54CA202995 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY · PI CIECIERSKI, CHRISTINA, FEINGLASS, JOSEPH M · 2015 to 2024
$9.5M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA202995NCI NIH HHS U54 CA202997NCI NIH HHS U54 CA203000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women of color do not have the same level of access to mammography services as their White counterparts, and this inequity may be one of the contributing factors to the documented racial disparity in breast cancer mortality in the US. The present study sought to assess the effectiveness of the mammogram party, a promising, but under-studied approach to increasing mammography uptake, particularly among under-served populations. The program targeted mammogram-eligible women in community settings on the west and southwest sides of Chicago, gathering basic demographic information, mammography history, and interest in assistance obtaining a mammogram. Women were navigated either through traditional one-on-one navigation or to a mammogram party. Seven outcome metrics were calculated for each type of navigation. We compared navigation outcomes for those who attended to those who did not attend a mammogram party using two-tailed t tests and chi-square tests. We found that the mammography completion rate for mammogram parties was comparable to that for standard one-on-one navigation (65.8 vs. 63.7%), which is more labor-intensive as evidenced by the number of contacts needed to successfully navigate a woman to mammography (10.9 vs. 15.0). Mammogram parties offer a unique opportunity for fellowship and support for clients who are particularly fearful of mammograms or identifying breast cancer. Programmatically, mammogram parties are an efficient way to complete several mammograms in 1 day. Having the option to both navigate women to mammogram parties or one-on-one navigation allows for more flexibility for scheduling and may ensure a completed a mammogram.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesMammographyPatient NavigationAdultBlack or African AmericanChicagoFemaleHealth PromotionHumansCommunity navigationEvaluationIncrease mammography use/uptakeMammogram parties/events

Identifiers

PMID28290092
PMCPMC5840031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.