Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28290002›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2017

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of select chemotherapeutic agents following intranasal delivery in a non-human primate model.

James C League-Pascual, Cynthia M Lester-McCully, Shaefali Shandilya, Lukas Ronner, Louis Rodgers, Rafael Cruz, Cody J Peer, William D Figg, Katherine E Warren

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Swine models for translational oncological research: an evolving landscape and regulatory considerations.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James C League-PascualFort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA, USA. james.c.league-pascual.mil@mail.mil.
Cynthia M Lester-McCullyPediatric-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Shaefali ShandilyaPediatric-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lukas RonnerPediatric-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Louis RodgersPediatric-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rafael CruzPediatric-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Cody J PeerClinical Pharmacology Program, Office of the Clinical Director, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
William D FiggClinical Pharmacology Program, Office of the Clinical Director, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Katherine E WarrenPediatric-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Preclinical evaluation of novel therapeutics for CNS tumor therapyZIABC011340 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WARREN, KATHERINE E · 2010 to 2019
$4.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits entry of most chemotherapeutic agents into the CNS, resulting in inadequate exposure within CNS tumor tissue. Intranasal administration is a proposed means of delivery that can bypass the BBB, potentially resulting in more effective chemotherapeutic exposure at the tumor site. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and pharmacokinetics (plasma and CSF) of intranasal delivery using select chemotherapeutic agents in a non-human primate (NHP) model. Three chemotherapeutic agents with known differences in CNS penetration were selected for intranasal administration in a NHP model to determine proof of principle of CNS delivery, assess tolerability and feasibility, and to evaluate whether certain drug characteristics were associated with increased CNS exposure. Intravenous (IV) temozolomide (TMZ), oral (PO) valproic acid, and PO perifosine were administered to adult male rhesus macaques. The animals received a single dose of each agent systemically and intranasally in separate experiments, with each animal acting as his own control. The dose of the agents administered systemically was the human equivalent of a clinically appropriate dose, while the intranasal dose was the maximum achievable dose based on the volume limitation of 1 mL. Multiple serial paired plasma and CSF samples were collected and quantified using a validated uHPLC/tandem mass spectrometry assay after each drug administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental analysis. CSF penetration was calculated from the ratio of areas under the concentration-time curves for CSF and plasma (AUC

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBlood-Brain BarrierDacarbazineDisease Models, AnimalMacaca mulattaMaleNasal AbsorptionPhosphorylcholineTemozolomideValproic AcidAntineoplastic AgentsDacarbazineperifosinePhosphorylcholineTemozolomideValproic AcidChemotherapyDIPGIntranasalNon-human primatePerifosinePharmacokineticsTemozolomideValproic acid

Identifiers

PMID28290002
PMCPMC7983166
OpenAlexW2595677678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.