Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28289934›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2017

Anoperineal disease in Hidradenitis Suppurativa : MR imaging distinction from perianal Crohn's disease.

Louise Monnier, Anthony Dohan, Nedjoua Amara, Anne-Marie Zagdanski, Moustapha Drame, Philippe Soyer, Christine Hoeffel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Imaging of perineal suppurations: a pictorial essay.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Nonfistulizing Perianal Crohn's Disease.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. MRI of perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Louise MonnierDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Maison Blanche, Avenue du Général Koenig, 51092, Reims Cedex, France. louisemonnier@live.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3387-6821
Anthony DohanDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France.
Nedjoua AmaraDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Maison Blanche, Avenue du Général Koenig, 51092, Reims Cedex, France.
Anne-Marie ZagdanskiDepartment of Radiology, Saint Louis Hospital, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France.
Moustapha DrameDepartment of Statistics, Hôpital Robert Debré, Avenue du Général Koenig, 51092, Reims Cedex, France.
Philippe SoyerUniversité Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 10 Avenue de Verdun, 75010, Paris, France.
Christine HoeffelDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Maison Blanche, Avenue du Général Koenig, 51092, Reims Cedex, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FRHôpital Robert-Debré · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS)-related anoperineal disease can be distinguished from Crohn's disease (CD) using MRI.

methodsPelvic MRI of 23 HS and 46 CD patients with anoperineal disease between 2007 and 2014 were independently analysed by two radiologists. For diagnosis of HS, sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood ratios (LRs) of inflammatory features and of their anatomical distribution were calculated and compared to those of CD.

resultsIn HS, fistulae were less present (P = .033) and less frequently involved the sphincters (P = .001) than in CD. Granulomas were more frequent (P = .0005). For anterior/inguinal and posterior localizations, sensitivity, specificity and LR for diagnosis of HS were 70% (49.1, 84.4), 87% (74.3, 93.9), 5.3 (2.41, 11.79) and 57% (36.8, 74.4), 93% (82.5, 97.8), 8.67 (2.74, 27.41), respectively. Combination of signs including posterior involvement, absence of rectal wall thickening and bilaterality of features yielded specificity of 100% (95% CI: 92.3-100) for HS.

conclusionAlthough MRI presentations of anoperineal disease may overlap between CD and HS, specific diagnosis of HS is possible with a combination of three features: absence of features' predominance in perianal area, absence of rectal wall thickening and bilaterality of features. KEY POINTS: • Spectrum of MRI features of HS-related anoperineal disease is wide. • Specific diagnosis of HS-related anoperineal disease is possible using MR imaging. • A combination of three MR signs allows distinction between HS and CD.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedCrohn DiseaseFemaleHidradenitis SuppurativaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPelvisPerineumRectal FistulaRectumSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultCrohn’s diseaseHidradenitis suppurativaMagnetic resonance imagingPerineumRectal fistula

Identifiers

PMID28289934
OpenAlexW2597320921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.