ReviewDer Nervenarzt2017
[Helpful instrumental examinations in idiopathic Parkinson's disease].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- My hand in my ear: a phantom limb re-induced by the illusion of body ownership in a patient with a brachial plexus lesion.Psychological research · 2019Article
- [New therapy approaches for Parkinson's disease].Der Nervenarzt · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (iPD) can be challenging. In these cases, additional diagnostic methods are available that can help to improve diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVES, MATERIAL AND
methodsThis article provides an overview of currently available and promising novel ancillary methods for the early and differential diagnosis of iPD.
resultsImaging tools, such as 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are mainly used for the differentiation between iPD and symptomatic parkinsonian syndromes (PS). High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging and iron and neuromelanin-sensitive high-field MRI sequences can become important in the future, particularly for earlier diagnosis. Transcranial B‑mode sonography of the substantia nigra and basal ganglia is established for early and differential diagnostics, especially in the combination of diagnostic markers but necessitates an adequately trained investigator and the use of validated digital image analysis instruments. DATScan can discriminate iPD from essential tremor, medication-induced parkinsonism and psychogenic movement disorder but not iPD from atypical PS. For the latter differential diagnosis, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and myocardial metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy can be helpful. Olfactory testing should preferably be used in combination with other diagnostic tests. Genetic, biochemical and histopathological tests are currently not recommended for routine use. Novel sensor-based techniques have a high potential to support clinical diagnosis of iPD but have not yet reached a developmental stage that is sufficient for clinical use. Novel sensor-based techniques have high potential to support clinical diagnosis of iPD, but have not yet reached a development stage that is sufficient for clinical use.
conclusionAncillary diagnostic methods can support the early and differential diagnosis of iPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.