Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28289438›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2017

Worldwide research productivity in the field of psychiatry.

Jinghua Zhang, Xiaoou Chen, Xin Gao, Huizeng Yang, Zhong Zhen, Qingwei Li, Yiqun Lin, Xiyan Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bibliometric Analysis of Literature on Physical Activity and COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Global scientific trends on aflatoxin research during 1998-2017: a bibliometric and visualized study.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jinghua Zhang *Department of Psychiatry, Tianjin Anding Hospital (Tianjin City Mental Health Center), Tianjin, China.
Xiaoou Chen *Department of Psychiatry, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Xin GaoDepartment of Psychiatry, Tianjin Anding Hospital (Tianjin City Mental Health Center), Tianjin, China.
Huizeng YangDepartment of Psychiatry, Tianjin Anding Hospital (Tianjin City Mental Health Center), Tianjin, China.
Zhong ZhenGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 5 BeiXianGe St., XiCheng District, Beijing, 100053 China.
Qingwei LiGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 5 BeiXianGe St., XiCheng District, Beijing, 100053 China.
Yiqun LinGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 5 BeiXianGe St., XiCheng District, Beijing, 100053 China.
Xiyan ZhaoGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 5 BeiXianGe St., XiCheng District, Beijing, 100053 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe field of psychiatry has seen significant progress in recent years due to worldwide contributions. National productivity, however, in the field of psychiatry is still unclear. In our study, we investigated contributions of individual nations to the field of psychiatry.

methodsThe Web of Science was used to perform a search from 2011 to 2015 on the subject category "psychiatry". The total number of articles, citations and the per capita numbers were obtained to analyze the contributions of different countries.

resultsIn psychiatry journals from 2011 to 2015, 84,760 articles were published worldwide. The most productive world areas were North America, East Asia, Europe and Oceania. The percentage of articles published in high-income countries was 87.77%, middle-income countries published 12.07%, and lower-income published 0.16%. Most articles were published by the United States (32.68%); the United Kingdom was next (8.59%), which was followed by Germany (6.77%), Australia (5.87%), and Canada (4.9%). The country with the highest number of citations (243,394) was the United States. A positive correlation was found between the population/GDP and the number of publications (P < 0.01). Australia ranked the highest when normalized to population size, and the Netherlands and Norway were next. The Netherlands ranked highest, followed by Israel and Australia when adjusted for GDP.

conclusionsThe authorship of most of the psychiatry articles was from high-income countries and few papers came from low-income countries. The most productive country was the United States. However, when normalized to population size and GDP, some European and Oceania countries were most productive.

Indexed as

CitationLiteratureProductivityPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID28289438
PMCPMC5310092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.