Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28289265›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Contact structure, mobility, environmental impact and behaviour: the importance of social forces to infectious disease dynamics and disease ecology.

Ronan F Arthur, Emily S Gurley, Henrik Salje, Laura S P Bloomfield, James H Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ronan F ArthurEmmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA rarthur@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8513-8348
Emily S GurleyDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Henrik SaljeDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3626-4254
Laura S P BloomfieldEmmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0416-3440
James H JonesDepartment of Earth Systems Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1680-6757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human factors, including contact structure, movement, impact on the environment and patterns of behaviour, can have significant influence on the emergence of novel infectious diseases and the transmission and amplification of established ones. As anthropogenic climate change alters natural systems and global economic forces drive land-use and land-cover change, it becomes increasingly important to understand both the ecological and social factors that impact infectious disease outcomes for human populations. While the field of disease ecology explicitly studies the ecological aspects of infectious disease transmission, the effects of the social context on zoonotic pathogen spillover and subsequent human-to-human transmission are comparatively neglected in the literature. The social sciences encompass a variety of disciplines and frameworks for understanding infectious diseases; however, here we focus on four primary areas of social systems that quantitatively and qualitatively contribute to infectious diseases as social-ecological systems. These areas are social mixing and structure, space and mobility, geography and environmental impact, and behaviour and behaviour change. Incorporation of these social factors requires empirical studies for parametrization, phenomena characterization and integrated theoretical modelling of social-ecological interactions. The social-ecological system that dictates infectious disease dynamics is a complex system rich in interacting variables with dynamically significant heterogeneous properties. Future discussions about infectious disease spillover and transmission in human populations need to address the social context that affects particular disease systems by identifying and measuring qualitatively important drivers.This article is part of the themed issue 'Opening the black box: re-examining the ecology and evolution of parasite transmission'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionClimate ChangeHost-Parasite InteractionsAnimalsCommunicable DiseasesHumansZoonosescomplex systemsdisease ecologyheterogeneityinfectious disease dynamicssocial–ecological systemssocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID28289265
PMCPMC5352824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.