Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28289256›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Global change, parasite transmission and disease control: lessons from ecology.

Joanne Cable, Iain Barber, Brian Boag, Amy R Ellison, Eric R Morgan, Kris Murray, Emily L Pascoe, Steven M Sait, Anthony J Wilson, Mark Booth

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 311 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Parasites and Parasitic Diseases in Small Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Joanne CableSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK cablej@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8510-7055
Iain BarberDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3955-6674
Brian BoagThe James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK.
Amy R EllisonSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK.
Eric R MorganSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.
Kris MurrayGrantham Institute - Climate Change and the Environment, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Emily L PascoeSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK.
Steven M SaitSchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Anthony J WilsonVector-borne Viral Diseases Programme, The Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 0NF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2000-2914
Mark BoothSchool of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Durham TS17 6BH, UK.
Cardiff University · GBDurham University · GBFondazione Edmund Mach · ITImperial College London · GBJames Hutton Institute · GBThe Pirbright Institute · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007033Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasitic infections are ubiquitous in wildlife, livestock and human populations, and healthy ecosystems are often parasite rich. Yet, their negative impacts can be extreme. Understanding how both anticipated and cryptic changes in a system might affect parasite transmission at an individual, local and global level is critical for sustainable control in humans and livestock. Here we highlight and synthesize evidence regarding potential effects of 'system changes' (both climatic and anthropogenic) on parasite transmission from wild host-parasite systems. Such information could inform more efficient and sustainable parasite control programmes in domestic animals or humans. Many examples from diverse terrestrial and aquatic natural systems show how abiotic and biotic factors affected by system changes can interact additively, multiplicatively or antagonistically to influence parasite transmission, including through altered habitat structure, biodiversity, host demographics and evolution. Despite this, few studies of managed systems explicitly consider these higher-order interactions, or the subsequent effects of parasite evolution, which can conceal or exaggerate measured impacts of control actions. We call for a more integrated approach to investigating transmission dynamics, which recognizes these complexities and makes use of new technologies for data capture and monitoring, and to support robust predictions of altered parasite dynamics in a rapidly changing world.This article is part of the themed issue 'Opening the black box: re-examining the ecology and evolution of parasite transmission'.

Indexed as

Animals, DomesticHost-Parasite InteractionsAnimal DiseasesAnimalsClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansParasitesclimate changeinfectious diseasestressorssustainable control

Identifiers

PMID28289256
PMCPMC5352815
OpenAlexW2550797582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.