Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28289251›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

The evolution of transmission mode.

Janis Antonovics, Anthony J Wilson, Mark R Forbes, Heidi C Hauffe, Eva R Kallio, Helen C Leggett, Ben Longdon, Beth Okamura, Steven M Sait, Joanne P Webster

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Winter is coming … How the hoarding behaviour of rodents fosters the persistence ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Standard ingredient ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Janis AntonovicsDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA ja8n@virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5189-1611
Anthony J WilsonIntegrative Entomology group, Vector-borne Viral Diseases programme, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright GU24 0NF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2000-2914
Mark R ForbesDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B7.
Heidi C HauffeDepartment of Biodiversity and Molecular Ecology, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach 1, 38010 S. Michele all'Adige, Trentino, Italy.
Eva R KallioDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyvaskyla, PO Box 35, 40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Helen C LeggettDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8758-355X
Ben LongdonCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6936-1697
Beth OkamuraDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW5 7BD, UK.
Steven M SaitSchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Joanne P WebsterDepartment of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, Centre for Emerging, Endemic and Exotic Diseases, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8616-4919

Funding

Ecology and evolution of multiple transmission modes: anther-smut diseaseR01GM122061 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI ANTONOVICS, JANIS · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007033Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007036NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122061Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews research on the evolutionary mechanisms leading to different transmission modes. Such modes are often under genetic control of the host or the pathogen, and often in conflict with each other via trade-offs. Transmission modes may vary among pathogen strains and among host populations. Evolutionary changes in transmission mode have been inferred through experimental and phylogenetic studies, including changes in transmission associated with host shifts and with evolution of the unusually complex life cycles of many parasites. Understanding the forces that determine the evolution of particular transmission modes presents a fascinating medley of problems for which there is a lack of good data and often a lack of conceptual understanding or appropriate methodologies. Our best information comes from studies that have been focused on the vertical versus horizontal transmission dichotomy. With other kinds of transitions, theoretical approaches combining epidemiology and population genetics are providing guidelines for determining when and how rapidly new transmission modes may evolve, but these are still in need of empirical investigation and application to particular cases. Obtaining such knowledge is a matter of urgency in relation to extant disease threats.This article is part of the themed issue 'Opening the black box: re-examining the ecology and evolution of parasite transmission'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHost-Parasite InteractionsAnimal DiseasesAnimalsHost-Pathogen Interactionscomplex life cycleshost shiftsinfectious diseasespill-over

Identifiers

PMID28289251
PMCPMC5352810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.