ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2018
Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Strategies for Tissue Engineering.
Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- 4D Printing in Regenerative Medicine: Bio-Inspired Applications for Dynamic Tissue Repair.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- 3D Printing for Neural Repair: Bridging the Gap in Regenerative Medicine.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Development of a two-layer 3D equine endometrial tissue model using genipin-crosslinked collagen scaffolds and 3D printing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing/Bioprinting and Cellular Therapies for Regenerative Medicine: Current Advances.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Tissue engineering approaches for lymphedema: biomaterial innovations and clinical potential.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- A scientometric and visualization analysis of 3D printing scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue engineering over the last decade.Regenerative therapy · 2024Review
- Characterization of a Bioink Combining Extracellular Matrix-like Hydrogel with Osteosarcoma Cells: Preliminary Results.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Microcapillary cell extrusion deposition with picolitre dispensing resolution.Bio-design and manufacturing · 2023Article
- Bioprinting small-diameter vascular vessel with endothelium and smooth muscle by the approach of two-step crosslinking process.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2022Article
- From Soft to Hard Biomimetic Materials: Tuning Micro/Nano-Architecture of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Three-dimensional-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds with interconnected hollow-pipe structures for enhanced bone regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2022Article
- Emerging Technologies in Multi-Material Bioprinting.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021Review
- Bioprinting Scaffolds for Vascular Tissues and Tissue Vascularization.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Applications of 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Effects of different aperture-sized type I collagen/silk fibroin scaffolds on the proliferation and differentiation of human dental pulp cells.Regenerative biomaterials · 2021Article
- Emergence of FRESH 3D printing as a platform for advanced tissue biofabrication.APL bioengineering · 2021Article
- 3D Bioprinting of Vascularized Tissues forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Biomaterials for Bioprinting Microvasculature.Chemical reviews · 2020Review
- Terasaki Institute: Innovating Personalized Health through Convergent Science and Bioengineering.Matter · 2020Article
- Extrusion and Microfluidic-based Bioprinting to Fabricate Biomimetic Tissues and Organs.Advanced materials technologies · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decades, many approaches have been developed to fabricate biomimetic extracellular matrices of desired properties for engineering functional tissues. However, the inability of these techniques to precisely control the spatial architecture has posed a significant challenge in producing complex tissues. 3D bioprinting technology has emerged as a potential solution by bringing unprecedented freedom and versatility in depositing biological materials and cells in a well-controlled manner in the 3D volumes, therefore achieving precision engineering of functional tissues. In this article, we review the application of 3D bioprinting to tissue engineering. We first discuss the general strategies for printing functional tissue constructs. We next describe different types of bioprinting with a focus on nozzle-based techniques and their respective advantages. Finally, we summarize the limitations of current technologies and propose challenges for future development of bioprinting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.