Observational studyStroke2017
Stroke and Circulating Extracellular RNAs.
Observational study in Stroke, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of the research progress of non-coding RNA in neuroinflammation and immune regulation in cerebral infarction/ischemia-reperfusion injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- Circulating MicroRNA Profiling Identifies Distinct MicroRNA Signatures in Acute Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Trial
- Changes in Whole-Blood microRNA Profiles during the Onset and Treatment Process of Cerebral Infarction: A Human Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Trial
- MambaCAttnGCN+: a comprehensive framework integrating MambaTextCNN, cross-attention and graph convolution network for piRNA-disease association prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Small Nucleolar RNAs: Biological Functions and Diseases.MedComm · 2025Review
- Bibliometric Analysis of Non-coding RNAs and Ischemic Stroke: Trends, Frontiers, and Challenges.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Review
- Data-driven cluster analysis and external validation identify phenotypic subgroups in renin-independent aldosteronism with differential cardiovascular risk and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Circulating extracellular RNAs, myocardial remodeling, and elevated BMI in patients with acute coronary syndrome.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2025Article
- Circulating extra-cellular RNAs and atrial fibrillation: data from the TRACE-CORE cohort.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Peripheral whole blood microRNA expression in relation to vascular function: a population-based study.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- SnoRNAs: Exploring Their Implication in Human Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Plasma Extracellular MicroRNAs Associated With Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Small RNA signatures of acute ischemic stroke in L1CAM positive extracellular vesicles.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Circulatory miR-411-5p as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Small but strong: the emerging role of small nucleolar RNA in cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Role of autophagy and transcriptome regulation in acute brain injury.Experimental neurology · 2022Review
- Identification of distinct circulating microRNAs in acute ischemic stroke patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Platelets as drivers of ischemia/reperfusion injury after stroke.Blood advances · 2021Review
- Can miRNAs Be Considered as Diagnostic and Therapeutic Molecules in Ischemic Stroke Pathogenesis?-Current Status.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeThere is increasing interest in extracellular RNAs (ex-RNAs), with numerous reports of associations between selected microRNAs (miRNAs) and a variety of cardiovascular disease phenotypes. Previous studies of ex-RNAs in relation to risk for cardiovascular disease have investigated small numbers of patients and assayed only candidate miRNAs. No human studies have investigated links between novel ex-RNAs and stroke.
methodsWe conducted unbiased next-generation sequencing using plasma from 40 participants of the FHS (Framingham Heart Study; Offspring Cohort Exam 8) followed by high-throughput polymerase chain reaction of 471 ex-RNAs. The reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction included 331 of the most abundant miRNAs, 43 small nucleolar RNAs, and 97 piwi-interacting RNAs in 2763 additional FHS participants and explored the relations of ex-RNAs and prevalent (n=63) and incident (n=51) stroke and coronary heart disease (prevalent=286, incident=69).
resultsAfter adjustment for multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors, 7 ex-RNAs were associated with stroke prevalence or incidence; there were no ex-RNA associated with prevalent or incident coronary heart disease. Statistically significant ex-RNA associations with stroke were specific, with no overlap between prevalent and incident events.
conclusionsThis is the largest study of ex-RNAs in relation to stroke using an unbiased approach in an observational cohort and the first large study to examine human small noncoding RNAs beyond miRNAs. These results demonstrate that when studied in a large observational cohort, extracellular miRNAs are associated with stroke risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.