Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28289228›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Wettability effect on nanoconfined water flow.

Keliu Wu, Zhangxin Chen, Jing Li, Xiangfang Li, Jinze Xu, Xiaohu Dong

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Condensation Effect and Transport on Alumina Porous Membranes.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Research Progress on Micro/Nanopore Flow Behavior.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Interstitial Fluid Behavior and Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Keliu WuDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada; wukeliu19850109@163.com zhachen@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0021-5007
Zhangxin ChenDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada; wukeliu19850109@163.com zhachen@ucalgary.ca.
Jing LiKey Laboratory for Petroleum Engineering of the Ministry of Education, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China.
Xiangfang LiKey Laboratory for Petroleum Engineering of the Ministry of Education, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China.
Jinze XuDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Xiaohu DongDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding and controlling the flow of water confined in nanopores has tremendous implications in theoretical studies and industrial applications. Here, we propose a simple model for the confined water flow based on the concept of effective slip, which is a linear sum of true slip, depending on a contact angle, and apparent slip, caused by a spatial variation of the confined water viscosity as a function of wettability as well as the nanopore dimension. Results from this model show that the flow capacity of confined water is 10

Indexed as

nanoconfined water flownanoporesslipviscositywettability

Identifiers

PMID28289228
PMCPMC5380095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.