Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28289120›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2017

The Challenges of Measuring, Improving, and Reporting Quality in Primary Care.

Richard A Young, Richard G Roberts, Richard J Holden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The role of the Quality and Outcomes Framework in the care of long-term conditions: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Ambulatory Medication Safety in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. "Kind of Feel Like the Lone Outpost": A Qualitative Exploration of Barriers to Professional Development for Rural Primary Care Providers at the Veterans Health Administration.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The contribution of Specialist Family Physicians to South Africa's private sector: A position statement.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  13. Quality indicators in respiratory therapy.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Co-Design with Patients for Improving Patient Safety: Strategies, Barriers and pitfalls.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard A YoungJPS Hospital Family Medicine Residency Program, Fort Worth, Texas ryoung01@jpshealth.org.
Richard G RobertsUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Richard J HoldenIndiana University School of Informatics and Computing, Bloomington, Indiana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a new set of priorities for quality management in primary care, acknowledging that payers and regulators likely will continue to insist on reporting numerical quality metrics. Primary care practices have been described as complex adaptive systems. Traditional quality improvement processes applied to linear mechanical systems, such as isolated single-disease care, are inappropriate for nonlinear, complex adaptive systems, such as primary care, because of differences in care processes, outcome goals, and the validity of summative quality scorecards. Our priorities for primary care quality management include patient-centered reporting; quality goals not based on rigid targets; metrics that capture avoidance of excessive testing or treatment; attributes of primary care associated with better outcomes and lower costs; less emphasis on patient satisfaction scores; patient-centered outcomes, such as days of avoidable disability; and peer-led qualitative reviews of patterns of care, practice infrastructure, and intrapractice relationships.

Indexed as

Health PrioritiesTotal Quality ManagementHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementUnited Statescomplex adaptive systemshealth policyprimary health carequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID28289120
PMCPMC5348238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.