Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28289082›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2017

Use of a Phosphorylation Site Mutant To Identify Distinct Modes of Gene Repression by the Control of Virulence Regulator (CovR) in Streptococcus pyogenes.

Nicola Horstmann, Pranoti Sahasrabhojane, Hui Yao, Xiaoping Su, Samuel A Shelburne

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PcsB Expression Diversity Influences onFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicola HorstmannDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Pranoti SahasrabhojaneDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hui YaoDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Xiaoping Su
Samuel A ShelburneDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA sshelburne@manderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Role of response regulator phosphorylation in group A streptococcal pathogenesisR01AI125292 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHELBURNE, SAMUEL A · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control of the virulence regulator/sensor kinase (CovRS) two-component system (TCS) serves as a model for investigating the impact of signaling pathways on the pathogenesis of Gram-positive bacteria. However, the molecular mechanisms by which CovR, an OmpR/PhoB family response regulator, controls virulence gene expression are poorly defined, partly due to the labile nature of its aspartate phosphorylation site. To better understand the regulatory effect of phosphorylated CovR, we generated the phosphorylation site mutant strain 10870-CovR-D53E, which we predicted to have a constitutive CovR phosphorylation phenotype. Interestingly, this strain showed CovR activity only for a subset of the CovR regulon, which allowed for classification of CovR-influenced genes into D53E-regulated and D53E-nonregulated groups. Inspection of the promoter sequences of genes belonging to each group revealed distinct promoter architectures with respect to the location and number of putative CovR-binding sites. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis demonstrated that recombinant CovR-D53E protein retains its ability to bind promoter DNA from both CovR-D53E-regulated and -nonregulated groups, implying that factors other than mere DNA binding are crucial for gene regulation. In fact, we found that CovR-D53E is incapable of dimerization, a process thought to be critical to OmpR/PhoB family regulator function. Thus, our global analysis of CovR-D53E indicates dimerization-dependent and dimerization-independent modes of CovR-mediated repression, thereby establishing distinct mechanisms by which this critical regulator coordinates virulence gene expression.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAmino Acid SubstitutionBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutant ProteinsPhosphorylationPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingProtein MultimerizationRegulonRepressor ProteinsStreptococcus pyogenesVirulenceBacterial ProteinsCsrR protein, Streptococcus pyogenesDNA, BacterialMutant ProteinsRepressor Proteinsdimerizationpathogenesisregulation of gene expressionStreptococcus pyogenestranscriptional regulationtwo-component regulatory systemsvirulence regulation

Identifiers

PMID28289082
PMCPMC5573087
OpenAlexW2595012033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.