Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28289051›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2017

Paediatric early warning systems for detecting and responding to clinical deterioration in children: a systematic review.

Veronica Lambert, Anne Matthews, Rachel MacDonell, John Fitzsimons

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04876872 (The Effectiveness of Modified Pediatric Early Warning Score and Pediatric Hospitalization Risk Scoring II in Patients Applying to the Pediatric Emergency Unit During Pandemic Period Associated With COVID-19 Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 86 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04876872 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of Modified Pediatric Early Warning Score and Pediatric Hospitalization Risk Scoring II in Patients Applying to the Pediatric Emergency Unit During Pandemic Period Associated With COVID-19 Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorKaradeniz Technical UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled894ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsno intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Veronica LambertSchool of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Anne MatthewsSchool of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Rachel MacDonellHSE Clinical Programmes, Office of Nursing & Midwifery Services Directorate, Health Service Executive.
John FitzsimonsOur Lady of Lourdes Hospital Drogheda & Quality Improvement Division Health Service Executive.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review the available evidence on paediatric early warning systems (PEWS) for use in acute paediatric healthcare settings for the detection of, and timely response to, clinical deterioration in children.

methodThe electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and Cochrane were searched systematically from inception up to August 2016. Eligible studies had to refer to PEWS, inclusive of rapid response systems and teams. Outcomes had to be specific to the identification of and/or response to clinical deterioration in children (including neonates) in paediatric hospital settings (including emergency departments). 2 review authors independently completed the screening and selection process, the quality appraisal of the retrieved evidence and data extraction; with a third reviewer resolving any discrepancies, as required. Results were narratively synthesised.

resultsFrom a total screening of 2742 papers, 90 papers, of varied designs, were identified as eligible for inclusion in the review. Findings revealed that PEWS are extensively used internationally in paediatric inpatient hospital settings. However, robust empirical evidence on which PEWS is most effective was limited. The studies examined did however highlight some evidence of positive directional trends in improving clinical and process-based outcomes for clinically deteriorating children. Favourable outcomes were also identified for enhanced multidisciplinary team work, communication and confidence in recognising, reporting and making decisions about child clinical deterioration.

conclusionsDespite many studies reporting on the complexity and multifaceted nature of PEWS, no evidence was sourced which examined PEWS as a complex healthcare intervention. Future research needs to investigate PEWS as a complex multifaceted sociotechnical system that is embedded in a wider safety culture influenced by many organisational and human factors. PEWS should be embraced as a part of a larger multifaceted safety framework that will develop and grow over time with strong governance and leadership, targeted training, ongoing support and continuous improvement.

Indexed as

AwarenessClinical DeteriorationCommunicationEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalHospitals, PediatricSeverity of Illness IndexChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, Newbornchildrenclinical deteriorationPaediatric early warning systemPEWSsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28289051
PMCPMC5353324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.