Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28289046›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2017

Observational study of the development and evaluation of a fertility preservation patient decision aid for teenage and adult women diagnosed with cancer: the Cancer, Fertility and Me research protocol.

G L Jones, J Hughes, N Mahmoodi, D Greenfield, G Brauten-Smith, J Skull, J Gath, D Yeomanson, E Baskind, J A Snowden and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02753296 (Development and Evaluation of a Patient Fertility Preservation Decision Aid for Women With Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02753296 unknown statusnot on this map

Development and Evaluation of a Patient Fertility Preservation Decision Aid for Women With Cancer: The Cancer, Fertility and Me Research Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of SheffieldRan2016 to 2018Enrolled98ConditionsCancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

G L JonesDepartment of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, City Centre Campus, Leeds, UK.
J HughesDepartment of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, City Centre Campus, Leeds, UK.
N MahmoodiDepartment of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, City Centre Campus, Leeds, UK.
D GreenfieldDepartment of Oncology, Sheffield Teaching NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK.
G Brauten-SmithBreast Cancer Care, London, UK.
J SkullJessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
J GathIndependent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK.
D YeomansonSheffield Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
E BaskindSeacroft Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
J A SnowdenDepartment of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield.
R M JacquesSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6710-5403
G VelikovaUniversity of Leeds, St James Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
K CollinsCentre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
D StarkUniversity of Leeds, St James Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
R PhillipsCenter for Review and Dissemination, University of York, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, York, UK.
S LaneOxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
H L BekkerLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
(On behalf of the Cancer, Fertility and Me research team)

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWomen diagnosed with cancer and facing potentially sterilising cancer treatment have to make time-pressured decisions regarding fertility preservation with specialist fertility services while undergoing treatment of their cancer with oncology services. Oncologists identify a need for resources enabling them to support women's fertility preservation decisions more effectively; women report wanting more specialist information to make these decisions. The overall aim of the 'Cancer, Fertility and Me' study is to develop and evaluate a new evidence-based patient decision aid (PtDA) for women with any cancer considering fertility preservation to address this unmet need. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective mixed-method observational study including women of reproductive age (16 years +) with a new diagnosis of any cancer across two regional cancer and fertility centres in Yorkshire, UK. The research involves three stages. In stage 1, the aim is to develop the PtDA using a systematic method of evidence synthesis and multidisciplinary expert review of current clinical practice and patient information. In stage 2, the aim is to assess the face validity of the PtDA. Feedback on its content and format will be ascertained using questionnaires and interviews with patients, user groups and key stakeholders. Finally, in stage 3 the acceptability of using this resource when integrated into usual cancer care pathways at the point of cancer diagnosis and treatment planning will be evaluated. This will involve a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the PtDA in clinical practice. Measures chosen include using count data of the PtDAs administered in clinics and accessed online, decisional and patient-reported outcome measures and qualitative feedback. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics, paired sample t-tests and CIs; interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research Ethics Committee approval (Ref: 16/EM/0122) and Health Research Authority approval (Ref: 194751) has been granted. Findings will be published in open access peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences for academic and health professional audiences, with feedback to health professionals and program managers. The Cancer, Fertility and Me patient decision aid (PtDA) will be disseminated via a diverse range of open-access media, study and charity websites, professional organisations and academic sources. External endorsement will be sought from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration inventory of PtDAs and other relevant professional organisations, for example, the British Fertility Society. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02753296; pre-results.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFertilityFertility PreservationHealth ServicesPatient ParticipationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInfertilityNeoplasmsPatient Acceptance of Health CareProspective StudiesResearch DesignUnited KingdomCancerDecision aidDecision-makingFertility preservationProtocol

Identifiers

PMID28289046
PMCPMC5353284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.