Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28288892›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2017

MR image-guided delivery of cisplatin-loaded brain-penetrating nanoparticles to invasive glioma with focused ultrasound.

Kelsie F Timbie, Umara Afzal, Abhijit Date, Clark Zhang, Ji Song, G Wilson Miller, Jung Soo Suk, Justin Hanes, Richard J Price

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sonoselective Transfection of Glioma Endothelium.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kelsie F TimbieDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, 415 Lane Road Building MR5, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
Umara AfzalDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States; Center for Nanomedicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States; Department of Biochemistry, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Shamsabad, Muree Road, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Abhijit DateDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States; Center for Nanomedicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
Clark ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States; Center for Nanomedicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
Ji SongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, 415 Lane Road Building MR5, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
G Wilson MillerDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, 480 Ray C Hunt Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
Jung Soo SukDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States; Center for Nanomedicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
Justin HanesDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States; Center for Nanomedicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
Richard J PriceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, 415 Lane Road Building MR5, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States. Electronic address: rprice@virginia.edu.

Funding

Brain Tumor-Penetrating Nanoparticle Delivery with MR-Guided Focused UltrasoundR01CA164789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HANES, JUSTIN S., PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
Immunotherapeutic Nanoparticle Delivery to Melanoma With MR-Guided Focused UltrasoundR01CA197111 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BULLOCK, TIMOTHY N, ENGELHARD, VICTOR H · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
Targeted Delivery of Brain Penetrating DNA Nanoparticles to Brain TumorsR01CA204968 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HANES, JUSTIN S., SUK, JUNG SOO · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
MRI-Guided miRNA Nanoparticle Delivery to Glioblastoma With Focused UltrasoundR01EB020147 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HANES, JUSTIN S., PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2015 to 2018
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164789NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197111NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204968NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemically administered chemotherapeutic drugs are often ineffective in the treatment of invasive brain tumors due to poor therapeutic index. Within gliomas, despite the presence of heterogeneously leaky microvessels, dense extracellular matrix and high interstitial pressure generate a "blood-tumor barrier" (BTB), which inhibits drug delivery and distribution. Meanwhile, beyond the contrast MRI-enhancing edge of the tumor, invasive cancer cells are protected by the intact blood-brain barrier (BBB). Here, we tested whether brain-penetrating nanoparticles (BPN) that possess dense surface coatings of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and are loaded with cisplatin (CDDP) could be delivered across both the blood-tumor and blood-brain barriers with MR image-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS), and whether this treatment could control glioma growth and invasiveness. To this end, we first established that MRgFUS is capable of significantly enhancing the delivery of ~60nm fluorescent tracer BPN across the blood-tumor barrier in both the 9L (6-fold improvement) gliosarcoma and invasive F98 (28-fold improvement) glioma models. Importantly, BPN delivery across the intact BBB, just beyond the tumor edge, was also markedly increased in both tumor models. We then showed that a CDDP loaded BPN formulation (CDDP-BPN), composed of a blend of polyaspartic acid (PAA) and heavily PEGylated polyaspartic acid (PAA-PEG), was highly stable, provided extended drug release, and was effective against F98 cells in vitro. These CDDP-BPN were delivered from the systemic circulation into orthotopic F98 gliomas using MRgFUS, where they elicited a significant reduction in tumor invasiveness and growth, as well as improved animal survival. We conclude that this therapy may offer a powerful new approach for the treatment invasive gliomas, particularly for preventing and controlling recurrence.

Indexed as

Ultrasonic WavesAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBrainBrain NeoplasmsCadaverineCarbocyaninesCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCisplatinDrug Delivery SystemsDrug LiberationFemaleFluorescent DyesGliomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlexa Fluor 647Antineoplastic AgentsCadaverineCarbocyaninesCisplatinFluorescent DyesPeptidespolyaspartatePolyethylene GlycolsBlood-brain barrierBlood-tumor barrierCisplatinFocused ultrasoundGliomaNanoparticle

Identifiers

PMID28288892
PMCPMC5593770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.