Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28288792›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2017

Disparities in the management of ectopic pregnancy.

Jennifer Y Hsu, Ling Chen, Arielle R Gumer, Ana I Tergas, June Y Hou, William M Burke, Cande V Ananth, Dawn L Hershman, Jason D Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Changing Paradigms in the Initial Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy at a University Hospital in Brazil.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Retrospective Evaluation of Patients Treated for Ectopic Pregnancy: Experience of a Tertiary Center.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer Y HsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Ling ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Arielle R GumerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Ana I TergasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
June Y HouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
William M BurkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
Cande V AnanthDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Dawn L HershmanDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
Jason D WrightDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. Electronic address: jw2459@columbia.edu.
Columbia University · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

The Influence of Hospital Variability on the Management of Cancer-Associated CompR01CA169121 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WRIGHT, JASON · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Using SWOG-Medicare database to evaluate long-term toxicities of cancer survivorsR01CA166084 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HERSHMAN, DAWN · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166084NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEctopic pregnancy is common among young women. Treatment can consist of either surgery with salpingectomy or salpingostomy or medical management with methotrexate. In addition to acute complications, treatment of ectopic pregnancy can result in long-term sequelae that include decreased fertility. Little is known about the patterns of care and predictors of treatment in women with ectopic pregnancy. Similarly, data on outcomes for various treatments are limited.

objectiveWe examined the patterns of care and outcomes for women with ectopic pregnancy. Specifically, we examined predictors of medical (vs surgical) management of ectopic pregnancy and tubal conservation (salpingostomy vs salpingectomy) among women who underwent surgery. STUDY

designThe Perspective database was used to identify women with a diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy treated from 2006-2015. Perspective is an all-payer database that collects data on patients at hospitals from throughout the United States. Women were classified as having undergone medical treatment, if they received methotrexate, and surgical treatment, if treatment consisted of salpingostomy or salpingectomy. Multivariable models were developed to examine predictors of medical treatment and of tubal conserving salpingostomy among women who were treated surgically.

resultsAmong the 62,588 women, 49,090 women (78.4%) were treated surgically, and 13,498 women (21.6%) received methotrexate. Use of methotrexate increased from 14.5% in 2006 to 27.3% by 2015 (P<.001). Among women who underwent surgery, salpingostomy decreased over time from 13.0% in 2006 to 6.0% in 2015 (P<.001). Treatment in more recent years, at a teaching hospital and at higher volume centers, were associated with the increased use of methotrexate (P<.05 for all). In contrast, Medicaid recipients (adjusted risk ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.98) and uninsured women (adjusted risk ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.93) were less likely to receive methotrexate than commercially insured patients. Among those who underwent surgery, black (adjusted risk ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.85) and Hispanic (adjusted risk ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.96) patients were less likely to undergo tubal conserving surgery than white women and Medicaid recipients (adjusted risk ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.75); uninsured women (adjusted risk ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.66) less frequently underwent salpingostomy than commercially insured patients.

conclusionThere is substantial variation in the management of ectopic pregnancy. There are significant race- and insurance-related disparities associated with treatment.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAbortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalAdultBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHumansInfertility, FemaleMedicaidMedically UninsuredMethotrexateMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPregnancyAbortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalMethotrexatedisparityectopic pregnancymethotrexatesalpingectomysalpingostomy

Identifiers

PMID28288792
PMCPMC5484775
OpenAlexW2594395949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.