ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2017
Disparities in the management of ectopic pregnancy.
Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Incidence and Outcomes of Surgically Managed Ectopic Pregnancy in Women With Disabilities: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2026Article
- Clinical Profile of Ectopic Pregnancy in a Tertiary Care Center: A Five-Year Retrospective Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2026Observational
- Association between adverse obstetric history and perinatal outcomes in singleton and twin pregnancies: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Frontier and Inequality Analyses of the Global Burden of Ectopic Pregnancy: Insights from the GBD 2021.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Article
- Long-term follow up of fecundability after ectopic pregnancy in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Changing Paradigms in the Initial Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy at a University Hospital in Brazil.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023Observational
- Global burden and trends of ectopic pregnancy: An observational trend study from 1990 to 2019.PloS one · 2023Observational
- To salping -ectomy or -ostomy: that is the question.F&S reports · 2022Article
- Racial and ethnic disparities in the surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy.F&S reports · 2022Article
- The Prevalence, Indications, Outcomes of the Most Common Major Gynecological Surgeries in Kazakhstan and Recommendations for Potential Improvements into Public Health and Clinical Practice: Analysis of the National Electronic Healthcare System (2014-2019).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Predictive value of PAPP-A for ectopic pregnancy and analysis of related factors.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- Retrospective Evaluation of Patients Treated for Ectopic Pregnancy: Experience of a Tertiary Center.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2020Article
- Predictors and clinical features of methotrexate (MTX) therapy for ectopic pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Chlamydia trachomatis and mycoplasma infections in tubal pregnancy.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Observational
- Article
- Ectopic pregnancy management and treatment strategies: A nationwide survey of Czech gynecological facilities.Women's health (London, England)Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEctopic pregnancy is common among young women. Treatment can consist of either surgery with salpingectomy or salpingostomy or medical management with methotrexate. In addition to acute complications, treatment of ectopic pregnancy can result in long-term sequelae that include decreased fertility. Little is known about the patterns of care and predictors of treatment in women with ectopic pregnancy. Similarly, data on outcomes for various treatments are limited.
objectiveWe examined the patterns of care and outcomes for women with ectopic pregnancy. Specifically, we examined predictors of medical (vs surgical) management of ectopic pregnancy and tubal conservation (salpingostomy vs salpingectomy) among women who underwent surgery. STUDY
designThe Perspective database was used to identify women with a diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy treated from 2006-2015. Perspective is an all-payer database that collects data on patients at hospitals from throughout the United States. Women were classified as having undergone medical treatment, if they received methotrexate, and surgical treatment, if treatment consisted of salpingostomy or salpingectomy. Multivariable models were developed to examine predictors of medical treatment and of tubal conserving salpingostomy among women who were treated surgically.
resultsAmong the 62,588 women, 49,090 women (78.4%) were treated surgically, and 13,498 women (21.6%) received methotrexate. Use of methotrexate increased from 14.5% in 2006 to 27.3% by 2015 (P<.001). Among women who underwent surgery, salpingostomy decreased over time from 13.0% in 2006 to 6.0% in 2015 (P<.001). Treatment in more recent years, at a teaching hospital and at higher volume centers, were associated with the increased use of methotrexate (P<.05 for all). In contrast, Medicaid recipients (adjusted risk ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.98) and uninsured women (adjusted risk ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.93) were less likely to receive methotrexate than commercially insured patients. Among those who underwent surgery, black (adjusted risk ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.85) and Hispanic (adjusted risk ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.96) patients were less likely to undergo tubal conserving surgery than white women and Medicaid recipients (adjusted risk ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.75); uninsured women (adjusted risk ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.66) less frequently underwent salpingostomy than commercially insured patients.
conclusionThere is substantial variation in the management of ectopic pregnancy. There are significant race- and insurance-related disparities associated with treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.