Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28288661›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2017

Sinus tarsi approach versus extensile lateral approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture: a meta-analysis of current evidence base.

Hui Yao, Tangzhao Liang, Yichun Xu, Gang Hou, Lulu Lv, Junbin Zhang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. [Study on Holosight robot-assisted fixation versus fixation via sinus tarsi approach in treatment of calcaneal fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. [Current Concepts in Intra-articular Calcaneus Fractures].Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025
    Article
  5. Current Concepts in Intra-articular Calcaneus Fractures.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui YaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NO. 2693 Kaichuang Road, Guangzhou, 510100, People's Republic of China. yaoww001@126.com.
Tangzhao LiangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NO. 2693 Kaichuang Road, Guangzhou, 510100, People's Republic of China.
Yichun XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NO. 2693 Kaichuang Road, Guangzhou, 510100, People's Republic of China.
Gang HouDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NO. 2693 Kaichuang Road, Guangzhou, 510100, People's Republic of China.
Lulu LvDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NO. 2693 Kaichuang Road, Guangzhou, 510100, People's Republic of China.
Junbin ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NO. 2693 Kaichuang Road, Guangzhou, 510100, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe extensile lateral approach (ELA) has been widely performed for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs), and wound complications remain a significant problem. As a minimal incision technique, the sinus tarsi approach (STA) was designed to overcome this disadvantage. There were already many reports about this approach but the conclusions were not completely consistent. Based on the current evidence, we performed this meta-analysis to compare the STA with ELA in the management of DIACF and expected to draw a certain and meaningful conclusion.

methodsAll potentially relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) were searched in the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrial.gov. The desirable outcomes including wound complications, excellent and good rate, secondary surgery rate and Böhler's angle were extracted. RCT studies were assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration, and cohort studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The data of RCTs and cohorts were pooled respectively using the fixed-effect model or random-effect model. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous data, and relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for dichotomous data. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the Q test and I

resultsSeven studies including two RCTs and five CSs were eligible for the meta-analysis. No matter RCTs or CSs, the pooled data all showed that STA group had a lower incidence of wound complications than that in the ELA group and no significant difference was found in excellent and good rate and the recovery of Böhler's angle between the two groups. The CSs also showed that the STA group had a lower incidence of secondary surgeries than that in the ELA group.

conclusionsThrough a STA, we not only can reduce the problems in wound healing but also achieve nearly the same adequate restoration of DIACF along with the similar functional outcomes compared with through an ELA.

Indexed as

Ankle InjuriesCalcaneusCohort StudiesEvidence-Based MedicineFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneHumansIntra-Articular FracturesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCalcaneusELAFractureSTA

Identifiers

PMID28288661
PMCPMC5348794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.