Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28288654›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2017

Non-invasive in vivo imaging of cardiac stem/progenitor cell biodistribution and retention after intracoronary and intramyocardial delivery in a swine model of chronic ischemia reperfusion injury.

María Collantes, Beatriz Pelacho, María José García-Velloso, Juán José Gavira, Gloria Abizanda, Itziar Palacios, Luis Rodriguez-Borlado, Virginia Álvarez, Elena Prieto, Margarita Ecay and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Direct Cell Radiolabeling forChemical reviews · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Anesthesia Protocols used to Create Ischemia Reperfusion Myocardial Infarcts in Swine.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Review
  10. Cell Tracking in Cancer Immunotherapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Evaluating Novel Targets of Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in Pig Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

María CollantesDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, IdisNA, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avda. Pío XII, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.
Beatriz PelachoCenter for Applied Medical Research (CIMA) Cell Therapy Area, IdiSNA, Universidad de Navarra, Avda. Pío XII, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.
María José García-VellosoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, IdisNA, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avda. Pío XII, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.
Juán José GaviraDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, IdiSNA, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avda. Pío XII, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.
Gloria AbizandaCenter for Applied Medical Research (CIMA) Cell Therapy Area, IdiSNA, Universidad de Navarra, Avda. Pío XII, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.
Itziar PalaciosCoretherapix, Santiago Grisolía, n° 2 Parque Científico de Madrid, Tres Cantos, 28760, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Rodriguez-BorladoCoretherapix, Santiago Grisolía, n° 2 Parque Científico de Madrid, Tres Cantos, 28760, Madrid, Spain.
Virginia ÁlvarezCoretherapix, Santiago Grisolía, n° 2 Parque Científico de Madrid, Tres Cantos, 28760, Madrid, Spain.
Elena PrietoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, IdisNA, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avda. Pío XII, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.
Margarita EcaySmall Animal Imaging Research Unit, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Eduardo LarequiCenter for Applied Medical Research (CIMA) Cell Therapy Area, IdiSNA, Universidad de Navarra, Avda. Pío XII, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.
Iván PeñuelasDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, IdisNA, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avda. Pío XII, 31080, Pamplona, Spain. ipenuelas@unav.es.
Felipe PrósperHematology and Cell Therapy, IdiSNA, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avda. Pío XII, 31080, Pamplona, Spain. fprosper@unav.es.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ESUniversidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe safety and efficacy of cardiac stem/progenitor cells (CSC) have been demonstrated in previous preclinical and clinical assays for heart failure. However, their optimal delivery route to the ischemic heart has not yet been assessed. This study was designed to determine by a non-invasive imaging technique (PET/CT) the biodistribution and acute retention of allogeneic pig CSC implanted by two different delivery routes, intracoronary (IC) and intramyocardial (IM), in a swine preclinical model of chronic ischemia-reperfusion.

methodsIschemia-reperfusion was induced in six Goettingen hybrid minipigs by 90 min coronary artery occlusion followed by reperfusion. Thirty days later, animals were allocated to receive IC (n = 3) or NOGA

resultsBiodistribution of

conclusionPET/CT imaging of

Indexed as

InjectionsStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsCell SeparationDiagnostic ImagingDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18GlucosamineMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryMyocardiumPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyStem CellsSus scrofaTissue DistributionFluorodeoxyglucose F18GlucosamineN-octanoylglucosylamineCardiac stem/progenitor cells (CSC)Cell trackingMyocardial infarctionPET/CTPreclinical pig model

Identifiers

PMID28288654
PMCPMC5347835
OpenAlexW2595081969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.