ArticleReproductive health2017
Medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in Australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study.
Article in Reproductive health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Abortion stigma among abortion providers in high-income countries: a mixed methods systematic review.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Pooled it
- Factors that affect the provision of medical abortion services in Australian primary care: a mixed methods systematic review.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to women's access to sexual and reproductive health services in rural Australia: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- The influence of rurality on women's decision making and pregnancy choices following an unintended pregnancy: A systematic review.Women's health (London, England)Pooled it
- "It's Not a One Size Fits All": Service Users' Views on How Service Structure Shapes Quality of Abortion Care in Britain. Findings from the SACHA Study.Studies in family planning · 2026Article
- Experiences and Perceptions of Doctors, Nurses, and Midwives Providing Abortion Care in Australia: A Scoping Review.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
- The Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Practice Nurses in the Provision of Medication Abortion: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Pharmacists' Perspectives on Nicotine Vaping Products (NVPs) for Smoking Cessation in Australia: A Qualitative Analysis.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Experiences of abortion care in Australia: a qualitative study examining multiple dimensions of access.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Providers' experiences with abortion care: A scoping review.PloS one · 2024Article
- "Almost like it was really underground": a qualitative study of women's experiences locating services for unintended pregnancy in a rural Australian health system.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2023Article
- Typologies of interactions between abortion seekers and healthcare workers in Australia: a qualitative study exploring the impact of stigma on quality of care.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Barriers and enablers to nurse practitioner implementation of medication abortion in Canada: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- A Virtual Community of Practice to Support Physician Uptake of a Novel Abortion Practice: Mixed Methods Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Factors influencing practitioners' who do not participate in ethically complex, legally available care: scoping review.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Article
- Perspectives Among Canadian Physicians on Factors Influencing Implementation of Mifepristone Medical Abortion: A National Qualitative Study.Annals of family medicine · 2020Article
- A Constructivist Vision of the First-Trimester Abortion Experience.Health and human rights · 2020Article
- Beyond Money: Conscientious Objection in Medicine as a Conflict of Interests.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAustralian Government approval in 2012 for the use of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP) allows general practitioners (GPs) to provide early gestation abortion in primary care settings. However, uptake of the MTOP provision by GPs appears to be low and the reasons for this have been unclear. This study investigated the provision of and referral for MTOP by GPs.
methodsWe undertook descriptive-interpretive qualitative research and selected participants for diversity using a matrix. Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews and one focus group (N = 4), were conducted with 32 GPs (8 MTOP providers, 24 non MTOP providers) in New South Wales, Australia. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A framework to examine access to abortion services was used to develop the interview questions and emergent themes identified thematically.
resultsThree main themes emerged: scope of practice; MTOP demand, care and referral; and workforce needs. Many GPs saw abortion as beyond the scope of their practice (i.e. a service others provide in specialist private clinics). Some GPs had religious or moral objections; others regarded MTOP provision as complicated and difficult. While some GPs expressed interest in MTOP provision they were concerned about stigma and the impact it may have on perceptions of their practice and the views of colleagues. Despite a reported variance in demand most MTOP providers were busy but felt isolated. Difficulties in referral to a local public hospital in the case of complications or the provision of surgical abortion were noted.
conclusionsExploring the factors which affect access to MTOP in general practice settings provides insights to assist the future planning and delivery of reproductive health services. This research identifies the need for support to increase the number of MTOP GP providers and for GPs who are currently providing MTOP. Alongside these actions provision in the public sector is required. In addition, formalised referral pathways to the public sector are required to ensure timely care in the case of complications or the provision of surgical options. Leadership and coordination across the health sector is needed to facilitate integrated abortion care particularly for rural and low income women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.