ArticleBMC health services research2017
Understanding the implementation and adoption of a technological intervention to improve medication safety in primary care: a realist evaluation.
Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Systematic review and narrative synthesis of computerized audit and feedback systems in healthcare.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of barcode medication administration on patient safety in UK hospital settings: protocol for a mixed-methods realist evaluation.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Optimising a clinical decision support tool to improve chronic kidney disease management in general practice.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Community-Based Interventions for the Treatment and Management of Conflict-Related Trauma in Low-Middle Income, Conflict-Affected Countries: a Realist Review.Journal of child & adolescent trauma · 2022Article
- Pharmacogenomic testing to support prescribing in primary care: a structured review of implementation models.Pharmacogenomics · 2021Review
- Article
- Pregnancy protection and pregnancies in women prescribed ACE inhibitors or ARBs: a cross-sectional study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020Article
- Evaluation of a pharmacist-led actionable audit and feedback intervention for improving medication safety in UK primary care: An interrupted time series analysis.PLoS medicine · 2020Article
- Development of competency model for family physicians against the background of 'internet plus healthcare' in China: a mixed methods study.Human resources for health · 2020Article
- Tracing the Decisions That Shaped the Development of MyChart, an Electronic Patient Portal in Alberta, Canada: Historical Research Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Understanding the utilisation of a novel interactive electronic medication safety dashboard in general practice: a mixed methods study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Implementing a social network intervention: can the context for its workability be created? A quasi-ethnographic study.Implementation science communications · 2020Article
- Realist evaluation of public engagement and involvement in data-intensive health research.Research involvement and engagement · 2020Article
- Using chronic kidney disease trigger tools for safety and learning: a qualitative evaluation in East London primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Article
- Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Secondary analysis of electronic health records in critical care medicine.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMonitoring for potentially hazardous prescribing is increasingly important to improve medication safety. Healthcare information technology can be used to achieve this aim, for example by providing access to prescribing data through surveillance of patients' electronic health records. The aim of our study was to examine the implementation and adoption of an electronic medicines optimisation system that was intended to facilitate clinical audit in primary care by identifying patients at risk of an adverse drug event. We adopted a sociotechnical approach that focuses on how complex social, organisational and institutional factors may impact upon the use of technology within work settings.
methodsWe undertook a qualitative realist evaluation of the use of an electronic medicines optimisation system in one Clinical Commissioning Group in England. Five semi-structured interviews, four focus groups and one observation were conducted with a range of stakeholders. Consistent with a realist evaluation methodology, the analysis focused on exploring the links between context, mechanism and outcome to explain the ways the intervention might work, for whom and in what circumstances.
resultsUsing the electronic medicines optimisation system could lead to a number of improved patient safety outcomes including pre-emptively reviewing patients at risk of adverse drug events. The effective use of the system depended upon engagement with the system, the flow of information between different health professionals centrally placed at the Clinical Commissioning Group and those locally placed at individual general practices, and upon variably adapting work practices to facilitate the use of the system. The use of the system was undermined by perceptions of ownership, lack of access, and lack of knowledge and awareness.
conclusionsThe use of an electronic medicines optimisation system may improve medication safety in primary care settings by identifying those patients at risk of an adverse drug event. To fully realise the potential benefits for medication safety there needs to be better utilisation across primary care and with a wider range of stakeholders. Engaging with all potential stakeholders and users prior to implementation of such systems might allay perceptions that the system is owned centrally and increase knowledge of the potential benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.