Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28288634›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Understanding the implementation and adoption of a technological intervention to improve medication safety in primary care: a realist evaluation.

Mark Jeffries, Denham L Phipps, Rachel L Howard, Anthony J Avery, Sarah Rodgers, Darren M Ashcroft

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic review and narrative synthesis of computerized audit and feedback systems in healthcare.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Pregnancy protection and pregnancies in women prescribed ACE inhibitors or ARBs: a cross-sectional study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Using chronic kidney disease trigger tools for safety and learning: a qualitative evaluation in East London primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark JeffriesCentre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. mark.jefferies@manchester.ac.uk.
Denham L PhippsCentre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rachel L HowardResearch Pharmacist, Isle of Wight, UK.
Anthony J AveryDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sarah RodgersDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Darren M AshcroftCentre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBIsle of Wight NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health GMPSTRC-2012-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonitoring for potentially hazardous prescribing is increasingly important to improve medication safety. Healthcare information technology can be used to achieve this aim, for example by providing access to prescribing data through surveillance of patients' electronic health records. The aim of our study was to examine the implementation and adoption of an electronic medicines optimisation system that was intended to facilitate clinical audit in primary care by identifying patients at risk of an adverse drug event. We adopted a sociotechnical approach that focuses on how complex social, organisational and institutional factors may impact upon the use of technology within work settings.

methodsWe undertook a qualitative realist evaluation of the use of an electronic medicines optimisation system in one Clinical Commissioning Group in England. Five semi-structured interviews, four focus groups and one observation were conducted with a range of stakeholders. Consistent with a realist evaluation methodology, the analysis focused on exploring the links between context, mechanism and outcome to explain the ways the intervention might work, for whom and in what circumstances.

resultsUsing the electronic medicines optimisation system could lead to a number of improved patient safety outcomes including pre-emptively reviewing patients at risk of adverse drug events. The effective use of the system depended upon engagement with the system, the flow of information between different health professionals centrally placed at the Clinical Commissioning Group and those locally placed at individual general practices, and upon variably adapting work practices to facilitate the use of the system. The use of the system was undermined by perceptions of ownership, lack of access, and lack of knowledge and awareness.

conclusionsThe use of an electronic medicines optimisation system may improve medication safety in primary care settings by identifying those patients at risk of an adverse drug event. To fully realise the potential benefits for medication safety there needs to be better utilisation across primary care and with a wider range of stakeholders. Engaging with all potential stakeholders and users prior to implementation of such systems might allay perceptions that the system is owned centrally and increase knowledge of the potential benefits.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyClinical AuditDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsElectronic Health RecordsEnglandEvaluation Studies as TopicGeneral PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareQuality ImprovementInformation technologyMedication safetyPrescribingPrimary careRealist evaluationSociotechnical

Identifiers

PMID28288634
PMCPMC5348746
OpenAlexW2597024446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.