Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28288610›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension.

Xu Wang, René Lindstroem, Niels Peter Bak Carstens, Thomas Graven-Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xu WangSMI, Department of Health and Science Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7D-3, 9220, Aalborg E, Denmark.
René LindstroemSMI, Department of Health and Science Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7D-3, 9220, Aalborg E, Denmark.
Niels Peter Bak CarstensVejgaard Kiropraktisk Klinik, Aalborg, Denmark.
Thomas Graven-NielsenCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Department of Health and Science Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej, 7D-39220, Aalborg, Denmark. tgn@hst.aau.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUpright head and neck position has been frequently applied as baseline for diagnosis of neck problems. However, the variance of the position after cervical motions has never been demonstrated. Thus, it is unclear if the baseline position varies evenly across the cervical joints. The purpose was to assess reposition errors of upright cervical spine.

methodsCervical reposition errors were measured in twenty healthy subjects (6 females) using video-fluoroscopy. Two flexion movements were performed with a 20 s interval, the same was repeated for extension, with an interval of 5 min between flexion and extension movements. Cervical joint positions were assessed with anatomical landmarks and external markers in a Matlab program. Reposition errors were extracted in degrees (initial position minus reposition) as constant errors (CEs) and absolute errors (AEs).

resultsTwelve of twenty-eight CEs (7 joints times 4 repositions) exceeded the minimal detectable change (MDC), while all AEs exceeded the MDC. Averaged AEs across the cervical joints were larger after 5 min' intervals compared to 20 s intervals (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThis is the first study to demonstrate single joint reposition errors of the cervical spine. The cervical spine returns to the upright positions with a 2° average absolute difference after cervical flexion and extension movements in healthy adults.

Indexed as

Range of Motion, ArticularAdultCervical VertebraeFemaleFluoroscopyHealthy VolunteersHumansJointsMaleMovementNeckPatient PositioningPostureTime FactorsYoung AdultCervical vertebraeFlexion and extensionFluoroscopyMotionNeckPosition senseRepositioningSpine

Identifiers

PMID28288610
PMCPMC5347814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.