Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28288609›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Social Exclusion Index-for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): a prospective nationwide study to extend and validate a multidimensional social exclusion questionnaire.

Addi P L van Bergen, Stella J M Hoff, Hanneke Schreurs, Annelies van Loon, Albert M van Hemert

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Socioeconomic inequalities and their impact on the health of seniors 65.Central European journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  2. The relationship between substance use and self-reported aspects of social functioning in patients with a psychotic disorder.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  3. Measuring social exclusion and its distribution in England.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Addi P L van BergenDepartment of Public Health, Municipality of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands. A.van.Bergen@utrecht.nl.
Stella J M HoffDepartment of Labour and Public Services, The Netherlands Institute of Social Research|SCP, The Hague, Netherlands.
Hanneke SchreursDepartment of Public Health, Municipality of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Annelies van LoonDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Albert M van HemertDepartment of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial exclusion (SE) refers to the inability of certain groups or individuals to fully participate in society. SE is associated with socioeconomic inequalities in health, and its measurement in routine public health monitoring is considered key to designing effective health policies. In an earlier retrospective analysis we demonstrated that in all four major Dutch cities, SE could largely be measured with existing local public health monitoring data. The current prospective study is aimed at constructing and validating an extended national measure for SE that optimally employs available items.

methodsIn 2012, a stratified general population sample of 258,928 Dutch adults completed a version of the Netherlands Public Health Monitor (PHM) questionnaire in which 9 items were added covering aspects of SE that were found to be missing in our previous research. Items were derived from the SCP social exclusion index, a well-constructed 15-item instrument developed by the Netherlands Institute for Social Research (SCP). The dataset was randomly divided into a development sample (N =129,464) and a validation sample (N = 129,464). Canonical correlation analysis was conducted in the development sample. The psychometric properties were studied and compared with those of the original SCP index. All analyses were then replicated in the validation sample.

resultsThe analysis yielded a four dimensional index, the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS), containing 8 SCP items and 9 PHM items. The four dimensions: "lack of social participation", "material deprivation", "lack of normative integration" and "inadequate access to basic social rights", were each measured with 3 to 6 items. The SEI-HS showed adequate internal consistency for both the general index and for two of four dimension scales. The internal structure and construct validity of the SEI-HS were satisfactory and similar to the original SCP index. Replication of the SEI-HS in the validation sample confirmed its generalisability.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that the SEI-HS offers epidemiologists and public health researchers a uniform, reliable, valid and efficient means of assessing social exclusion and its underlying dimensions. The study also provides valuable insights in how to develop embedded measures for public health surveillance.

Indexed as

Health EquitySocial IsolationAdultAgedFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProspective StudiesPsychological DistancePsychometricsPublic HealthReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesEmbedded measureHealth inequalitiesNon-linear canonical correlation analysisOVERALSPublic health monitoringSocial exclusion

Identifiers

PMID28288609
PMCPMC5348771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.