Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28288599›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2017

Clinical use of computational modeling for surgical planning of arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis.

Michela Bozzetto, Stefano Rota, Valentina Vigo, Francesco Casucci, Carlo Lomonte, Walter Morale, Massimo Senatore, Luigi Tazza, Massimo Lodi, Giuseppe Remuzzi and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06411353 (The Relationship Between Blood Flow Conditions and Sounds in Arteriovenous Fistulae for Hemodialysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06411353 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Relationship Between Blood Flow Conditions and Sounds in Arteriovenous Fistulae for Hemodialysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological ResearchRan2025 to 2028Enrolled15ConditionsEnd Stage Renal DiseaseArmsMRI acquisition, US examination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michela BozzettoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Bergamo, Italy.
Stefano RotaUnit of Nephrology and Dialysis, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Valentina VigoUnit of Nephrology and Dialysis, Ente Ecclesiastico "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy.
Francesco CasucciUnit of Nephrology and Dialysis, Ente Ecclesiastico "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy.
Carlo LomonteUnit of Nephrology and Dialysis, Ente Ecclesiastico "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy.
Walter MoraleUnit of Nephrology and Dialysis, A.O. Cannizzaro, Catania, Italy.
Massimo SenatoreUnit of Nephrology and Dialysis, Ospedale Annunziata, Cosenza, Italy.
Luigi TazzaDepartment of Urology and Nephrology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Massimo LodiUnit of Nephrology and Dialysis, Ospedale S. Spirito, Pescara, Italy.
Giuseppe RemuzziDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Bergamo, Italy.
Andrea RemuzziDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Bergamo, Italy. andrea.remuzzi@marionegri.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the best vascular access (VA) for hemodialysis, but its creation is still a critical procedure. Physical examination, vascular mapping and doppler ultrasound (DUS) evaluation are recommended for AVF planning, but they can not provide direct indication on AVF outcome. We recently developed and validated in a clinical trial a patient-specific computational model to predict pre-operatively the blood flow volume (BFV) in AVF for different surgical configuration on the basis of demographic, clinical and DUS data. In the present investigation we tested power of prediction and usability of the computational model in routine clinical setting.

methodsWe developed a web-based system (AVF.SIM) that integrates the computational model in a single procedure, including data collection and transfer, simulation management and data storage. A usability test on observational data was designed to compare predicted vs. measured BFV and evaluate the acceptance of the system in the clinical setting. Six Italian nephrology units were involved in the evaluation for a 6-month period that included all incident dialysis patients with indication for AVF surgery.

resultsOut of the 74 patients, complete data from 60 patients were included in the final dataset. Predicted brachial BFV at 40 days after surgery showed a good correlation with measured values (in average 787 ± 306 vs. 751 ± 267 mL/min, R = 0.81, p < 0.001). For distal AVFs the mean difference (±SD) between predicted vs. measured BFV was -2.0 ± 20.9%, with 50% of predicted values in the range of 86-121% of measured BFV. Feedbacks provided by clinicians indicate that AVF.SIM is easy to use and well accepted in clinical routine, with limited additional workload.

conclusionsClinical use of computational modeling for AVF surgical planning can help the surgeon to select the best surgical strategy, reducing AVF early failures and complications. This approach allows individualization of VA care, with the aim to reduce the costs associated with VA dysfunction, and to improve AVF clinical outcome.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArteriovenous Shunt, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalPostoperative ComplicationsRenal DialysisArteriovenous fistulaComputational modelingHemodialysis vascular accessSurgical planning

Identifiers

PMID28288599
PMCPMC5348915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.