Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28288597›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2017

School-based vaccination programmes: a systematic review of the evidence on organisation and delivery in high income countries.

Sarah Perman, Simon Turner, Angus I G Ramsay, Abigail Baim-Lance, Martin Utley, Naomi J Fulop

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. School-based screening for high blood pressure in children and adolescents: a systematic scoping review.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah PermanDepartment of Applied Health Research, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Simon TurnerDepartment of Applied Health Research, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Angus I G RamsayDepartment of Applied Health Research, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Abigail Baim-LanceDepartment of Applied Health Research, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Martin UtleyClinical Operational Research Unit, UCL, 4 Taviton Street, London, WC1H 0BT, UK.
Naomi J FulopDepartment of Applied Health Research, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. n.fulop@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health [UK] 027/0090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany countries have recently expanded their childhood immunisation programmes. Schools are an increasingly attractive setting for delivery of these new immunisations because of their ability to reach large numbers of children in a short period of time. However, there are organisational challenges to delivery of large-scale vaccination programmes in schools. Understanding the facilitators and barriers is important for improving the delivery of future school-based vaccination programmes.

methodsWe undertook a systematic review of evidence on school-based vaccination programmes in order to understand the influence of organisational factors on the delivery of programmes. Our eligibility criteria were studies that (1) focused on childhood or adolescent vaccination programmes delivered in schools; (2) considered organisational factors that influenced the preparation or delivery of programmes; (3) were conducted in a developed or high-income country; and (4) had been peer reviewed. We searched for articles published in English between 2000 and 2015 using MEDLINE and HMIC electronic databases. Additional studies were identified by searching the Cochrane Library and bibliographies. We extracted data from the studies, assessed quality and the risk of bias, and categorised findings using a thematic framework of eight organisational factors.

resultsWe found that most of the recent published literature is from the United States and is concerned with the delivery of pandemic or seasonal flu vaccination programmes at a regional (state) or local level. We found that the literature is largely descriptive and not informed by the use of theory. Despite this, we identified common factors that influence the implementation of programmes. These factors included programme leadership and governance, organisational models and institutional relationships, workforce capacity and roles particularly concerning the school nurse, communication with parents and students, including methods for obtaining consent, and clinic organisation and delivery.

conclusionsThis is the first time that information has been brought together on the organisational factors influencing the delivery of vaccination programmes in school-based settings. An understanding of these factors, underpinned by robust theory-informed research, may help policy-makers and managers design and deliver better programmes. We identified several gaps in the research literature to propose a future research agenda, informed by theories of implementation and organisational change.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesSchool Health ServicesSchoolsVaccinationCommunicationHumansImmunization ProgramsInfluenza VaccinesParentsInfluenza VaccinesImplementationMass vaccinationOrganisational changeSchoolsVaccination

Identifiers

PMID28288597
PMCPMC5348876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.