Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28288579›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2017

The cost-effectiveness of using chronic kidney disease risk scores to screen for early-stage chronic kidney disease.

Benjamin O Yarnoff, Thomas J Hoerger, Siobhan K Simpson, Alyssa Leib, Nilka R Burrows, Sundar S Shrestha, Meda E Pavkov, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CKD Initiative

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Framework of Guidelines for Management of CKD in Asia.Kidney international reports · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin O YarnoffRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA. byarnoff@rti.org.
Thomas J HoergerRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Siobhan K SimpsonRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Alyssa LeibRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Nilka R BurrowsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sundar S ShresthaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Meda E PavkovCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CKD Initiative
RTI International · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetter treatment during early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) may slow progression to end-stage renal disease and decrease associated complications and medical costs. Achieving early treatment of CKD is challenging, however, because a large fraction of persons with CKD are unaware of having this disease. Screening for CKD is one important method for increasing awareness. We examined the cost-effectiveness of identifying persons for early-stage CKD screening (i.e., screening for moderate albuminuria) using published CKD risk scores.

methodsWe used the CKD Health Policy Model, a micro-simulation model, to simulate the cost-effectiveness of using CKD two published risk scores by Bang et al. and Kshirsagar et al. to identify persons in the US for CKD screening with testing for albuminuria. Alternative risk score thresholds were tested (0.20, 0.15, 0.10, 0.05, and 0.02) above which persons were assigned to receive screening at alternative intervals (1-, 2-, and 5-year) for follow-up screening if the first screening was negative. We examined incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental lifetime costs divided by incremental lifetime QALYs, relative to the next higher screening threshold to assess cost-effectiveness. Cost-effective scenarios were determined as those with ICERs less than $50,000 per QALY. Among the cost-effective scenarios, the optimal scenario was determined as the one that resulted in the highest lifetime QALYs.

resultsICERs ranged from $8,823 per QALY to $124,626 per QALY for the Bang et al. risk score and $6,342 per QALY to $405,861 per QALY for the Kshirsagar et al. risk score. The Bang et al. risk score with a threshold of 0.02 and 2-year follow-up screening was found to be optimal because it had an ICER less than $50,000 per QALY and resulted in the highest lifetime QALYs.

conclusionsThis study indicates that using these CKD risk scores may allow clinicians to cost-effectively identify a broader population for CKD screening with testing for albuminuria and potentially detect people with CKD at earlier stages of the disease than current approaches of screening only persons with diabetes or hypertension.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlbuminuriaComorbidityCost-Benefit AnalysisCost of IllnessEarly DiagnosisFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaPrevalenceRenal Insufficiency, ChronicChronic kidney diseaseRisk scoresScreening

Identifiers

PMID28288579
PMCPMC5347833
OpenAlexW2595986895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.