ArticleBMC nephrology2017
The cost-effectiveness of using chronic kidney disease risk scores to screen for early-stage chronic kidney disease.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening for chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of emerging evidence and perspectives.Renal failure · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review of diagnostic and prognostic models of chronic kidney disease in low-income and middle-income countries.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of a prognostic risk assessment for early-stage 1-3b diabetic kidney disease patients in the United States.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Risk Stratification in Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease in the US Veterans Population.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- First-time diagnosis and referral practices for individuals with CKD by primary care physicians: a study of electronic medical records across multiple clinics in Japan.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2025Observational
- Chronic Kidney Disease Is Associated With Increased All-Cause Mortality Risk Among Older Black Adults.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.Diabetes care · 2025 · on this mapReview
- Examining chronic kidney disease screening frequency among diabetics: a POMDP approach.Health care management science · 2024Article
- Prevalence and associations of chronic kidney disease among antiretroviral therapy-naïve persons living with HIV in Lagos, Nigeria.BMC nephrology · 2024Article
- Accuracy of glomerular filtration rate estimation using creatinine and cystatin C for identifying and monitoring moderate chronic kidney disease: the eGFR-C study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Article
- Framework of Guidelines for Management of CKD in Asia.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness of screening for chronic kidney disease in the general adult population: a systematic review.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.Diabetes care · 2024Review
- Best-Practice Perspectives on Improving Early Detection and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease Associated With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness of screening for chronic kidney disease using a cumulative eGFR-based statistic.PloS one · 2024Article
- Strategies to Improve Long-Term Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in China.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.Diabetes care · 2023Review
- External validation of six clinical models for prediction of chronic kidney disease in a German population.BMC nephrology · 2022Article
- Performance of Diabetes and Kidney Disease Screening Scores in Contemporary United States and Korean Populations.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBetter treatment during early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) may slow progression to end-stage renal disease and decrease associated complications and medical costs. Achieving early treatment of CKD is challenging, however, because a large fraction of persons with CKD are unaware of having this disease. Screening for CKD is one important method for increasing awareness. We examined the cost-effectiveness of identifying persons for early-stage CKD screening (i.e., screening for moderate albuminuria) using published CKD risk scores.
methodsWe used the CKD Health Policy Model, a micro-simulation model, to simulate the cost-effectiveness of using CKD two published risk scores by Bang et al. and Kshirsagar et al. to identify persons in the US for CKD screening with testing for albuminuria. Alternative risk score thresholds were tested (0.20, 0.15, 0.10, 0.05, and 0.02) above which persons were assigned to receive screening at alternative intervals (1-, 2-, and 5-year) for follow-up screening if the first screening was negative. We examined incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental lifetime costs divided by incremental lifetime QALYs, relative to the next higher screening threshold to assess cost-effectiveness. Cost-effective scenarios were determined as those with ICERs less than $50,000 per QALY. Among the cost-effective scenarios, the optimal scenario was determined as the one that resulted in the highest lifetime QALYs.
resultsICERs ranged from $8,823 per QALY to $124,626 per QALY for the Bang et al. risk score and $6,342 per QALY to $405,861 per QALY for the Kshirsagar et al. risk score. The Bang et al. risk score with a threshold of 0.02 and 2-year follow-up screening was found to be optimal because it had an ICER less than $50,000 per QALY and resulted in the highest lifetime QALYs.
conclusionsThis study indicates that using these CKD risk scores may allow clinicians to cost-effectively identify a broader population for CKD screening with testing for albuminuria and potentially detect people with CKD at earlier stages of the disease than current approaches of screening only persons with diabetes or hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.