Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28288561›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2017

Coinfection outcome in an opportunistic pathogen depends on the inter-strain interactions.

Hanna Kinnula, Johanna Mappes, Lotta-Riina Sundberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intra-hostMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Cohabitation ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cooperative Interaction ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanna KinnulaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science (and Nanoscience Center), Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Johanna MappesDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science (and Nanoscience Center), Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Lotta-Riina SundbergDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science (and Nanoscience Center), Jyvaskyla, Finland. lotta-riina.sundberg@jyu.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-3510-4398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn nature, organisms are commonly coinfected by two or more parasite strains, which has been shown to influence disease virulence. Yet, the effects of coinfections of environmental opportunistic pathogens on disease outcome are still poorly known, although as host-generalists they are highly likely to participate in coinfections. We asked whether coinfection with conspecific opportunistic strains leads to changes in virulence, and if these changes are associated with bacterial growth or interference competition. We infected zebra fish (Danio rerio) with three geographically and/or temporally distant environmental opportunist Flavobacterium columnare strains in single and in coinfection. Growth of the strains was studied in single and in co-cultures in liquid medium, and interference competition (growth-inhibiting ability) on agar.

resultsThe individual strains differed in their virulence, growth and ability for interference competition. Number of coinfecting strains significantly influenced the virulence of infection, with three-strain coinfection differing from the two-strain and single infections. Differences in virulence seemed to associate with the identity of the coinfecting bacterial strains, and their pairwise interactions. This indicates that benefits of competitive ability (production of growth-inhibiting compounds) for virulence are highest when multiple strains co-occur, whereas the high virulence in coinfection may be independent from in vitro bacterial growth.

conclusionsIntraspecific competition can lead to plastic increase in virulence, likely caused by faster utilization of host resources stimulated by the competitive interactions between the strains. However, disease outcome depends both on the characteristics of individual strains and their interactions. Our results highlight the importance of strain interactions in disease dynamics in environments where various pathogen genotypes co-occur.

Indexed as

ZebrafishAnimalsCoinfectionFish DiseasesFlavobacteriumGenotypeHost-Pathogen InteractionsHost SpecificityVirulenceCompetitionCooperationFlavobacterium columnareGenotypeInhibitionVirulenceZebra fish

Identifiers

PMID28288561
PMCPMC5348763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.