ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2017
Survival Comparison of Patients With Cystic Fibrosis in Canada and the United States: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Symbiotic Supplementation in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Transition of children with life-limiting conditions to adult care and healthcare use: a systematic review.Pediatric research · 2021Pooled it
- Association of site of treatment with clinical outcomes following intravenous antimicrobial treatment of a pulmonary exacerbation.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2022Trial
- Feasibility and efficacy of combined pancreatic islet-lung transplantation in cystic fibrosis-related diabetes-PIM study: A multicenter phase 1-2 trial.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022Trial
- Article
- Impact of air pollution on lung function in cystic fibrosis over a decade in London: a UK CF Registry study.Thorax · 2026Article
- MASLD and Pancreatic Diseases: From Shared Mechanisms to Clinical Implications and Future Directions.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Evaluating Long-Term Effectiveness of Cystic Fibrosis Modulator Therapies after Rapid Adoption: A Dual-Approach Study.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2026Article
- The Changing Transplant Landscape in the Era of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor: A Word of Caution.Clinical transplantation · 2025Article
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in adults with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: Rationale and emerging evidence.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- Impact of CFTR Modulators on Longitudinal Cystic Fibrosis Survival and Mortality: Review and Secondary Analysis.Pulmonary therapy · 2025Review
- Exploring reduced pulmonary exacerbation rates in cystic fibrosis: a pandemic or modulator effect?ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Exploring pediatric palliative care in Luxembourg: a mixed-methods study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Validating the Data Completeness and Accuracy of the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Registry.Canadian respiratory journal · 2025Article
- Factors associated with cystic fibrosis mortality before the age of 30: retrospective analysis of a cohort in southern Brazil.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2024Article
- Cystic Fibrosis in an Adolescent: A "Miranda Warning" Against Blaming TB-A Case-Based Scholarly Update.Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics · 2024Article
- Worth a Double Take? An In-Depth Review of Lung Retransplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Cystic fibrosis survival outcomes following second lung transplant: The north American experience.Clinical transplantation · 2023Article
- Cystic fibrosis-related mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2020: an observational analysis of time trends and disparities.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
- Gaps in Cystic Fibrosis Care Are Associated with Reduced Lung Function in the U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023Article
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn 2011, the median age of survival of patients with cystic fibrosis reported in the United States was 36.8 years, compared with 48.5 years in Canada. Direct comparison of survival estimates between national registries is challenging because of inherent differences in methodologies used, data processing techniques, and ascertainment bias.
objectiveTo use a standardized approach to calculate cystic fibrosis survival estimates and to explore differences between Canada and the United States.
designPopulation-based study.
setting42 Canadian cystic fibrosis clinics and 110 U.S. cystic fibrosis care centers. PATIENTS: Patients followed in the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Registry (CCFR) and U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) between 1990 and 2013. MEASUREMENTS: Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare survival between patients followed in the CCFR (n = 5941) and those in the CFFPR (n = 45 448). Multivariable models were used to adjust for factors known to be associated with survival.
resultsMedian age of survival in patients with cystic fibrosis increased in both countries between 1990 and 2013; however, in 1995 and 2005, survival in Canada increased at a faster rate than in the United States (P < 0.001). On the basis of contemporary data from 2009 to 2013, the median age of survival in Canada was 10 years greater than in the United States (50.9 vs. 40.6 years, respectively). The adjusted risk for death was 34% lower in Canada than the United States (hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.81]). A greater proportion of patients in Canada received transplants (10.3% vs. 6.5%, respectively [standardized difference, 13.7]). Differences in survival between U.S. and Canadian patients varied according to U.S. patients' insurance status. LIMITATION: Ascertainment bias due to missing data or nonrandom loss to follow-up might affect the results.
conclusionDifferences in cystic fibrosis survival between Canada and the United States persisted after adjustment for risk factors associated with survival, except for private-insurance status among U.S. patients. Differential access to transplantation, increased posttransplant survival, and differences in health care systems may, in part, explain the Canadian survival advantage. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.