Trial reportJournal of affective disorders2017
Therapeutic relationship in the treatment of geriatric depression with executive dysfunction.
Trial report in Journal of affective disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining the Longitudinal Effects of Therapeutic Alliance Based on Session Rating Scale Scores on Suicidal Desire in Homebound Older Adults.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2026Article
- Characterizing primary care patient referrals and attendance patterns for virtual lifestyle medicine shared medical appointments.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Engineering Virtuous health habits using Emotion and Neurocognition: Flexibility for Lifestyle Optimization and Weight management (EVEN FLOW).Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Review
- Gut Microbiome Diversity and Abundance Correlate with Gray Matter Volume (GMV) in Older Adults with Depression.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Clinical Neuropsychological Evaluation in Older Adults With Major Depressive Disorder.Current psychiatry reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe effects of therapeutic relationship (TR) in elder mental health are understudied. A greater understanding of TR in geriatric psychotherapy is particularly needed for treating late-life depression with executive dysfunction, which predicts poor response to antidepressant medication and presents unique clinical challenges.
methodsParticipants were older patients (N = 220) with major depression and executive dysfunction who received 12 weeks of problem-solving therapy or supportive therapy in a randomized control trial. Multilevel growth curve modeling and latent change scores were used to analyze TR dimensions of Understanding and Accepting at the patient level (individual patient ratings, N = 194) and therapist level (ratings of each therapist averaged across participants, N = 10).
resultsTR predicted reduction of depression in both treatment groups, while treatment×TR interactions were not significant. Patients treated by therapists with higher average Understanding (patient and therapist level) and Accepting (therapist level) ratings had greater decreases in depression. The patient level×therapist level interaction for Understanding approached statistical significance (p=.065), suggesting a synergistic effect on treatment outcome. Together, Understanding and Accepting predicted 21% of variance in depression level changes. LIMITATIONS: TR was not assessed throughout the course of treatment (only after the first therapy session and at post-treatment) and did not include ratings from an objective evaluator.
conclusionsAssessment of patient's experience of the TR and of therapist ability to foster Understanding and Accepting can play a significant role in the delivery of geriatric psychosocial interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.