ArticleJAMA internal medicine2017
Variation in Physician Spending and Association With Patient Outcomes.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Measuring and Improving Evidence-Based Patient Care Using a Web-Based Gamified Approach in Primary Care (QualityIQ): Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Trial
- Comparing Methods for Attributing Hospital Quality Metrics to Individual Physicians: Impact on Performance Assessment and Outlier Identification.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Powered Wearable and Portable Devices for Remote Cardiac Care and Population Health.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Influence of Admitting Clinician on Outcomes in Post-Acute Facilities.Health services research · 2026Article
- Antibiotic Use in Patients with Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Association of Inpatient Prescribing of First-Generation Antihistamines With Delirium in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Applying an implementation science lens to understand physician-level variation in patient length of stay in internal medicine.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- A study on the impact of DRG payment on physicians' prescribing behavior in China: a case study of a healthcare consortium in J City.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Association Between Blood Urea Nitrogen to Serum Albumin Ratio and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
- Is more better? A multilevel analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention hospital openings and closures on patient volumes.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) reform on cost homogeneity of treatment for patients with malignant tumours.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Outcomes related to hospital characteristics of heart transplant centers: A National Readmission Database analysis.JHLT open · 2024Article
- Article
- Data-driven approach to identifying potential laboratory overuse in general internal medicine (GIM) inpatients.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Impact of Diagnosis-Related-Group (DRG) payment on variation in hospitalization expenditure: evidence from China.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Performance management of generalist care for hospitalised multimorbid patients-a scoping review for value-based care.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
- Article
- Burden of Repeated Hospitalizations on Patients with Heart Failure: An Analysis of Administrative and Claims Data in Japan.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2022Article
- The Association of Attending Physicians' Publications and Patients' Readmission Rates: Evidence from Tertiary Hospitals in China Using a Retrospective Data Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: While the substantial variation in health care spending across regions and hospitals is well known, key clinical decisions are ultimately made by physicians. However, the degree to which spending varies across physicians and the clinical consequences of that variation are unknown. Objective: To investigate variation in spending across physicians and its association with patient outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this retrospective data analysis, we analyzed a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 65 years and older who were hospitalized with a nonelective medical condition and treated by a general internist between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2014. We first quantified the proportion of variation in Medicare Part B spending attributable to hospitals, physicians, and patients. We then examined the association between physician spending and patient outcomes, adjusted for patient and physician characteristics and hospital fixed effects (effectively comparing physicians within the same hospital). Our primary analysis focused on hospitalist physicians, whose patients are plausibly quasirandomized within a hospital based on physician work schedule. A secondary analysis focused on general internists overall. To ensure that patient illness severity did not directly affect physician spending estimates, we calculated physicians' spending levels in 2011 through 2012 and examined outcomes of their patients in 2013 and 2014. Exposures: Physicians' adjusted Part B spending level in 2011 through 2012. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients' 30-day mortality and readmission rates in 2013 and 2014. Results: To determine the amount of variation across physicians we included 485 016 hospitalizations treated by 21 963 physicians at 2837 acute care hospitals for the analysis of hospitalists and 839 512 hospitalizations treated by 50 079 physicians at 3195 acute care hospitals for the analysis of general internists. Variation in spending across physicians within hospital was larger than variation across hospitals (for hospitalists, 8.4% across physicians vs 7.0% across hospitals; for general internists, 10.5% across physicians vs 6.2% across hospitals). Higher physician spending was not associated with lower 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for additional $100 in physician spending, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.01; P = .47) or readmissions (aOR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01; P = .54) for hospitalists within the same hospital. We observed similar patterns among general internists. Conclusions and Relevance: Health care spending varies more across individual physicians than across hospitals. However, higher physician spending is not associated with better outcomes of hospitalized patients. Our findings suggest policies targeting both physicians and hospitals may be more effective in reducing wasteful spending than policies focusing solely on hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.