SynthesisJAMA internal medicine2017
Association of Intensive Blood Pressure Control and Kidney Disease Progression in Nondiabetic Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 67 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.
- National Heart Center/Saudi Heart Association 2025 Guidelines for Cardiovascular Diseases Prevention and Risk Assessment.Saudi medical journal · 2026Guideline
- The role of renal denervation for the treatment of hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease: a position paper of the Italian Society of Nephrology.Journal of nephrology · 2025Guideline
- Evaluating blood pressure targets in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of ketoanalogue supplementation combined with protein-restricted diets in advanced chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of nephrology · 2024Pooled it
- Blood pressure targets for hypertension in people with chronic renal disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Blood pressure targets in adults with hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Guideline
- Battle of the giants: KDIGO vs. Cochrane - who is the winner in the fight for blood pressure targets in chronic kidney disease?Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaPooled it
- Intensive Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Outcomes Across Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome Stages: A Post Hoc Analysis of the China Rural Hypertension Control Project.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Association of Acute Kidney Injury with Cardiovascular Events and Death in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.American journal of nephrology · 2019Trial
- Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Kidney Tubule Injury: Findings From the ACCORD Trial Study Participants.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2019Trial
- Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Lowering in People With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA cardiology · 2026Article
- Systolic blood pressure strata and acute kidney injury risk in heart failure: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- BP and Kidney Disease Progression in Advanced CKD: Findings from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort and KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients with CKD Studies.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
- Blood pressure targets for the prevention of chronic kidney disease: the discrepancies between observational studies and randomized controlled trials.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2025Article
- Impact of intensive blood pressure control on kidney outcomes.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2025Review
- Mortality among individuals with chronic kidney disease based on the 2012 and 2021 KDIGO blood pressure targets.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Risk prediction modeling for cardiorenal clinical outcomes in patients with non-diabetic CKD using US nationwide real-world data.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Management of hypertension in chronic kidney disease: current perspectives and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The optimal blood pressure (BP) target remains debated in nondiabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Objective: To compare intensive BP control (<130/80 mm Hg) with standard BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) on major renal outcomes in patients with CKD without diabetes. Data Sources: Searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for publications up to March 24, 2016. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials that compared an intensive vs a standard BP target in nondiabetic adults with CKD, reporting changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), doubling of serum creatinine level, 50% reduction in GFR, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or all-cause mortality. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Random-effects meta-analyses for pooling effect measures. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses for exploring heterogeneity. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in annual rate of change in GFR were expressed as mean differences with 95% CIs. Differences in doubling of serum creatinine or 50% reduction in GFR, ESRD, composite renal outcome, and all-cause mortality were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs. Results: We identified 9 trials with 8127 patients and a median follow-up of 3.3 years. Compared with standard BP control, intensive BP control did not show a significant difference on the annual rate of change in GFR (mean difference, 0.07; 95% CI, -0.16 to 0.29 mL/min/1.73 m2/y), doubling of serum creatinine level or 50% reduction in GFR (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.76-1.29), ESRD (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78-1.18), composite renal outcome (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.81-1.21), or all-cause mortality (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.66-1.37). Nonblacks and patients with higher levels of proteinuria showed a trend of lower risk of kidney disease progression with intensive BP control. Conclusions and Relevance: Targeting BP below the current standard did not provide additional benefit for renal outcomes compared with standard treatment during a follow-up of 3.3 years in patients with CKD without diabetes. However, nonblack patients or those with higher levels of proteinuria might benefit from the intensive BP-lowering treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.