Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28288180›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus: Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of 14 cases.

Akinori Egashira, Masaru Morita, Reiko Kumagai, Ken-Ichi Taguchi, Masanobu Ueda, Shohei Yamaguchi, Manabu Yamamoto, Kazuhito Minami, Yasuharu Ikeda, Yasushi Toh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gastrointestinal tract, its pathophysiology andWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinical predictors of special type of esophageal cancer.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akinori EgashiraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masaru MoritaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Reiko KumagaiDepartment of Cancer Pathology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ken-Ichi TaguchiDepartment of Cancer Pathology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masanobu UedaDepartment of Radiology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shohei YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Manabu YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kazuhito MinamiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yasuharu IkedaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yasushi TohDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the esophagus is a rare and highly aggressive disease but the biological features are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of NEC of the esophagus.

methodsFourteen patients diagnosed with NEC of the esophagus from 1998 to 2013 were included in this study. Clinicopathologic features, therapeutic outcomes and immunohistochemical results were analyzed.

resultsEleven out of 14 cases showed protruding or localized type with or without ulceration. Only three patients were negative for both lymph node and organ metastasis and seven cases were positive for metastases to distant organs and/or distant lymph nodes. Of the six patients with limited disease (LD), three patients were treated by surgery. Three patients with LD and seven patients with extensive disease (ED) were initially treated with chemotherapy, except for one who underwent concurrent chemo-radiotherapy due to passage disturbance. The median survival of patients with LD was 8.5 months, whereas that of patients with LD was 17 months. Among the 14 cases, 12 cases (83.3%), 13 cases (91.7%) and 12 cases (83.3%) showed positive immunostaining for choromogranin A, synaptophysin and CD56, respectively. Nine of 14 cases (64.2%) presented positive staining for c-kit and most (8/9, 88%) simultaneously showed p53 protein abnormality. Two cases were negative for c-kit and p53, and positive for CK20.

conclusionConsistent with previous reports, the prognosis of NEC of esophagus is dismal. From the results of immunohistochemical study, NEC of esophagus might be divided into two categories due to the staining positivity of c-kit and p53. This study provides new insight into the biology of NEC of the esophagus.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID28288180
PMCPMC5348034
OpenAlexW2595093248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.