ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
Parameter estimation for multistage clonal expansion models from cancer incidence data: A practical identifiability analysis.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A fast numerical integration scheme for clonal expansion processes on graphs.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Metabolic Carcinogenesis.Cancer treatment and research · 2024Review
- Assessing potential insights of an imperfect testing strategy: Parameter estimation and practical identifiability using early COVID-19 data in India.Communications in nonlinear science & numerical simulation · 2023Article
- Autoimmune alleles at the major histocompatibility locus modify melanoma susceptibility.American journal of human genetics · 2023Article
- Mechanistic inference of the metabolic rates underlyingJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2023Article
- Structural identifiability of compartmental models for infectious disease transmission is influenced by data type.Epidemics · 2022Article
- Modeling age-specific incidence of colon cancer via niche competition.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Estimation of Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis in a U.S. Breast Screening Cohort.Annals of internal medicine · 2022Article
- Parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification using information geometry.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Review
- Identifiability analysis for stochastic differential equation models in systems biology.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
- Testing structural identifiability by a simple scaling method.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Recent advances in cancer chemoprevention with phytochemicals.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2020Review
- Case Studies of Gastric, Lung, and Oral Cancer Connect Etiologic Agent Prevalence to Cancer Incidence.Cancer research · 2018Article
- What is the meaning of 'A compound is carcinogenic'?Toxicology reports · 2018Review
- Fighting Cancer with Mathematics and Viruses.Viruses · 2017Review
- Correction: Parameter estimation for multistage clonal expansion models from cancer incidence data: A practical identifiability analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many cancers are understood to be the product of multiple somatic mutations or other rate-limiting events. Multistage clonal expansion (MSCE) models are a class of continuous-time Markov chain models that capture the multi-hit initiation-promotion-malignant-conversion hypothesis of carcinogenesis. These models have been used broadly to investigate the epidemiology of many cancers, assess the impact of carcinogen exposures on cancer risk, and evaluate the potential impact of cancer prevention and control strategies on cancer rates. Structural identifiability (the analysis of the maximum parametric information available for a model given perfectly measured data) of certain MSCE models has been previously investigated. However, structural identifiability is a theoretical property and does not address the limitations of real data. In this study, we use pancreatic cancer as a case study to examine the practical identifiability of the two-, three-, and four-stage clonal expansion models given age-specific cancer incidence data using a numerical profile-likelihood approach. We demonstrate that, in the case of the three- and four-stage models, several parameters that are theoretically structurally identifiable, are, in practice, unidentifiable. This result means that key parameters such as the intermediate cell mutation rates are not individually identifiable from the data and that estimation of those parameters, even if structurally identifiable, will not be stable. We also show that products of these practically unidentifiable parameters are practically identifiable, and, based on this, we propose new reparameterizations of the model hazards that resolve the parameter estimation problems. Our results highlight the importance of identifiability to the interpretation of model parameter estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.