Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28288156›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2017

Parameter estimation for multistage clonal expansion models from cancer incidence data: A practical identifiability analysis.

Andrew F Brouwer, Rafael Meza, Marisa C Eisenberg

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Metabolic Carcinogenesis.Cancer treatment and research · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanistic inference of the metabolic rates underlyingJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew F BrouwerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3779-5287
Rafael MezaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1076-5037
Marisa C EisenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4221-830X

Funding

Mechanistic Modeling of Oropharyngeal Cancer Treatment and Recurrence (Supplement)U01CA182915 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI EISENBERG, MARISA C, MEZA, RAFAEL · 2014 to 2019
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA182915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many cancers are understood to be the product of multiple somatic mutations or other rate-limiting events. Multistage clonal expansion (MSCE) models are a class of continuous-time Markov chain models that capture the multi-hit initiation-promotion-malignant-conversion hypothesis of carcinogenesis. These models have been used broadly to investigate the epidemiology of many cancers, assess the impact of carcinogen exposures on cancer risk, and evaluate the potential impact of cancer prevention and control strategies on cancer rates. Structural identifiability (the analysis of the maximum parametric information available for a model given perfectly measured data) of certain MSCE models has been previously investigated. However, structural identifiability is a theoretical property and does not address the limitations of real data. In this study, we use pancreatic cancer as a case study to examine the practical identifiability of the two-, three-, and four-stage clonal expansion models given age-specific cancer incidence data using a numerical profile-likelihood approach. We demonstrate that, in the case of the three- and four-stage models, several parameters that are theoretically structurally identifiable, are, in practice, unidentifiable. This result means that key parameters such as the intermediate cell mutation rates are not individually identifiable from the data and that estimation of those parameters, even if structurally identifiable, will not be stable. We also show that products of these practically unidentifiable parameters are practically identifiable, and, based on this, we propose new reparameterizations of the model hazards that resolve the parameter estimation problems. Our results highlight the importance of identifiability to the interpretation of model parameter estimates.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticModels, StatisticalCell Transformation, NeoplasticCocarcinogenesisComputer SimulationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansIncidenceMarkov ChainsPancreatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28288156
PMCPMC5367820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.