Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28287898›Full record

ReviewNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2017

Consequences of a tight squeeze: Nuclear envelope rupture and repair.

Philipp Isermann, Jan Lammerding

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pathological α-Synuclein Perturbs Nuclear Integrity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Label-Free Microfluidic Apheresis of Circulating Tumor Cell Clusters.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Molecular Mechanisms for the Regulation of Nuclear Membrane Integrity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Mechanics and functional consequences of nuclear deformations.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Sonoporation: Past, Present, and Future.Advanced materials technologies · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philipp Isermanna Nancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering & Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology , Cornell University , Ithaca , NY , USA.
Jan Lammerdinga Nancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering & Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology , Cornell University , Ithaca , NY , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4335-8611

Funding

Project 3: Physical and Metabolic Constraints of Cancer Cell InvasionU54CA210184 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI FISCHBACH, CLAUDIA · 2016 to 2020
$10.2M
Nuclear mechanics and mechanotransduction in muscular laminopathiesR01HL082792 · NHLBI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LAMMERDING, JAN · 2007 to 2023
$4.8M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210184NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL082792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell migration through tight spaces can induce substantial deformations of the nucleus and cause nuclear envelope (NE) rupture, resulting in uncontrolled exchange of nuclear and cytosolic proteins. These events can cause DNA damage and, in severe cases, nuclear fragmentation, challenging the integrity of the genomic material. Cells overcome NE ruptures during interphase by repairing the NE using components of the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) machinery. Paralleling the molecular mechanism used during NE reformation in late mitosis, ESCRT-III subunits and the associated AAA-ATPase VPS4B are recruited to NE rupture sites and help restore NE integrity. While these findings are common to many cell types, they are particularly relevant in the context of cancer metastasis, where nuclear deformation and rupture could drive genomic instability in invading cells and further promote cancer progression. At the same time, inhibiting NE repair may offer new therapeutic approaches to specifically target invasive cancer cells.

Indexed as

Biological TransportCell MovementHumansIntracellular MembranesNuclear Envelopeconfined migrationDNA damageESCRTlaminanuclear envelope rupture

Identifiers

PMID28287898
PMCPMC5499899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.